Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #162761

Re: Decimal Floating Point

Show all headers | View raw

On 9/11/2021 5:23 AM, James Kuyper wrote:
> On 9/10/21 3:04 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
>> James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> ...
>>> Yes, but because they are not in the C standard, they're not C standard
>>> types, which means that the best place to ask questions about them is
>>> not this newsgroup.
>>
>> I disagree.  This is comp.lang.c, not comp.lang.std.c.
> 
> That doesn't change anything - you'll get better responses to a question
> about GnuC in a forum specific to GnuC, and you'll get better answers to
> a question about Visual C in a forum devoted to Visual C, you'll get
> better answers to questions about tcc are in a forum devoted to tcc,
> etc. The only questions where this is the best place to get an answer
> are questions that are not specific to any particular compiler - which
> is pretty much the same as standard C.
> 

I am not going to make a lot of fuzz about this, however one 
consideration seems relevant:

You keep saying "you'll get better answers...", now while this obviously 
depends on topicality (although I don't agree entirely with your 
definition of this newsgroup), it also depends on the activity of the 
posters involved.
Considering that most of the Usenet is dead thanks to spammers, trolls, 
and, last in order, migration to other platforms, while this newsgroup 
is still somewhat active, this gives a better chance to get a good 
answer here, where there is a fair number of competent people, rather 
than from a group that might be more specific, but just inactive.

Obviously this doesn't mean that any question about programming should 
land here, but a question about feasibility or use of numeric C types 
(considerably more general than e.g. Gtk types) in the language doesn't 
seem odd to me - better than kicking off anything that is not (yet) in 
the standard; that doesn't seem helpful for the activity of the group, 
to my opinion.
You might have seen that recently there was a thread on comp.lang.c++ 
about rational numbers, also not part of the C++ standard, but which 
still led to some interesting follow-ups - again, better than kicking 
the thing off as "not standard"

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Decimal Floating Point Fabian Russell <fr314159@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 06:35 -0700
  Re: Decimal Floating Point "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 08:17 -0700
    Re: Decimal Floating Point scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-10 15:44 +0000
      Re: Decimal Floating Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 12:06 -0400
        Re: Decimal Floating Point Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-10 18:09 +0200
          Re: Decimal Floating Point Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2021-09-10 16:23 +0000
          Re: Decimal Floating Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 12:37 -0400
        Re: Decimal Floating Point Fabian Russell <fr314159@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 09:38 -0700
          Re: Decimal Floating Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 12:58 -0400
        Re: Decimal Floating Point Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2021-09-10 18:11 +0000
          Re: Decimal Floating Point Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 12:13 -0700
            Re: Decimal Floating Point Fabian Russell <fr314159@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 14:52 -0700
            Re: Decimal Floating Point Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2021-09-11 07:09 -0700
          Re: Decimal Floating Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 23:23 -0400
        Re: Decimal Floating Point scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-10 19:04 +0000
          Re: Decimal Floating Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 23:23 -0400
            Re: Decimal Floating Point Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-18 19:20 +0200
              Re: Decimal Floating Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-20 00:16 -0400
    Re: Decimal Floating Point Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 11:14 -0700
      Re: Decimal Floating Point Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-10 23:50 +0100
        Re: Decimal Floating Point David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-11 20:22 +0200
          Re: Decimal Floating Point Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-11 15:37 -0700
            Re: Decimal Floating Point David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-12 12:58 +0200
      Re: Decimal Floating Point Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 17:36 -0700
  Re: Decimal Floating Point Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 18:04 +0200
  Re: Decimal Floating Point Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 18:06 +0200
    Re: Decimal Floating Point Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 09:37 -0700
      Re: Decimal Floating Point Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 20:43 +0200
    Re: Decimal Floating Point "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 09:52 -0700
      Re: Decimal Floating Point Fabian Russell <fr314159@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 10:08 -0700
        Re: Decimal Floating Point antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2021-09-11 00:36 +0000
    Re: Decimal Floating Point scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-10 19:07 +0000
      Re: Decimal Floating Point Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-11 06:31 +0200
        Re: Decimal Floating Point Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-10 23:29 -0700
          Re: Decimal Floating Point Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-11 16:31 +0200
            Re: Decimal Floating Point Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@delq.com> - 2021-09-11 10:04 -0700
            Re: Decimal Floating Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-11 15:08 -0400
              Re: Decimal Floating Point Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-11 15:39 -0700
                Re: Decimal Floating Point Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-11 19:28 -0400
  Re: Decimal Floating Point Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-10 11:21 -0700
  Re: Decimal Floating Point Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2021-09-10 23:29 +0200
  Re: Decimal Floating Point Kaz Kylheku <563-365-8930@kylheku.com> - 2021-09-11 16:59 +0000
    Re: Decimal Floating Point Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-11 16:05 -0700
      Re: Decimal Floating Point Kaz Kylheku <563-365-8930@kylheku.com> - 2021-09-14 16:25 +0000
  Re: Decimal Floating Point "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-09-12 13:08 -0700
  Re: Decimal Floating Point Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com> - 2021-09-13 22:23 -0400

csiph-web