Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.crypt |
| Subject | Re: Triangulation Cryptography.- The Triangle model is Merely the Box That the Ciphertext Travels In' |
| Date | 2021-09-17 22:53 +0200 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <si2v8e$qas$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <94ae51ef-0cbd-465f-b238-b5950d8188dbn@googlegroups.com> <si2930$q24$1@dont-email.me> <si2al8$12id$1@gioia.aioe.org> <si2u4d$srl$2@dont-email.me> |
On 17.09.21 22:34, Rich wrote: > Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> wrote: >> On 17.09.21 16:35, Richard Heathfield wrote: >>> On 17/09/2021 14:25, austin obyrne wrote: >> <snip> >>> >>> Since you can only encrypt a limited subset of ASCII, a trial decrypt >>> that results only in ASCII 32-126 is a fair bet for closer inspection. >> >> Tbh, if the whole system works in base, idk, 94 of something, this >> wouldn't work. But, I doubt this, too and the limitation is of course a >> bit weird. > > Actually, Austin's 'system' works in binary (although he does not > realize this) and his "characters" are, likely (MM could say with > greater accuracy) stored in the Ada equivalent of a C char * string > (i.e., one byte per character). And they are stored using the ASCII > codepoints. His 'limitation' of ASCII 32-126 is because Ada's text > mode I/O library (the only one Austin knows how to use) enforces that > all characters read in from a file (or from a terminal) must lie > between 32-126 (with special 'behind the scenes' handling of newlines, > which is why Austin is also ignorant of ASCII newlines). > > But it is most definetly not "base 94". It is simply ASCII, with each > code point encoded into a single byte. I am pretty certain, you are right about that. > > And yes, if one were to perform a brute force run against one of his > examples, one could immediately reject as invalid any output which had > any byte with a value other than 32-126 present. That significantly > narrows the number of trials that one has to otherwise examine. > Absolutely. I was just playing devil's advocate. I am sure the approach I mentioned is not what is happening. Cheers, Max
Back to sci.crypt | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Triangulation Cryptography.- The Triangle model is Merely the Box That the Ciphertext Travels In' austin obyrne <ao402468@gmail.com> - 2021-09-17 06:25 -0700
Re: Triangulation Cryptography.- The Triangle model is Merely the Box That the Ciphertext Travels In' Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-09-17 15:35 +0100
Re: Triangulation Cryptography.- The Triangle model is Merely the Box That the Ciphertext Travels In' Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-17 17:01 +0200
Re: Triangulation Cryptography.- The Triangle model is Merely the Box That the Ciphertext Travels In' Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-17 20:34 +0000
Re: Triangulation Cryptography.- The Triangle model is Merely the Box That the Ciphertext Travels In' Max <maxturv26@gmx.net> - 2021-09-17 22:53 +0200
csiph-web