Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #81297

Re: rational numbers

From David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: rational numbers
Date 2021-09-17 17:49 +0200
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <si2df7$s1t$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <shvr5o$ovs$1@gioia.aioe.org> <3PK0J.78848$g81.78219@fx33.iad> <si1fl2$k9o$1@dont-email.me> <si1jvi$en8$1@dont-email.me> <si26oc$n9k$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 17/09/2021 15:55, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> Am 17.09.21 um 10:34 schrieb David Brown:
>> On 17/09/2021 09:21, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
>>>      Am 16.09.21 um 19:05 schrieb Scott Lurndal:
>>>> I suspect that the vast majority of people use existing
>>>> software packages like Matlab or R (for statistics) than write C++ code
>>>> for numerical software nowadays.  It's really hard to get it
>>>> right when using binary floating point, hence standard numerical
>>>> libraries (LINPACK, et alia).
>>>
>>> I am a scientist, and Matlab and R are popular, but slowly they give way
>>> to Python. With the "numpy" package wrapping LAPACK and "scipy", which
>>> is based on it, Python code almost looks like Matlab, but it's
>>> completely open source. To my understanding, that and the machine
>>> learning libs are the reasons why Python gained so much in the last
>>> years. The language on its own is not that much better than other modern
>>> scripting languages, it's the libraries with a large user base.
>>>
>>
>> Python might not be much better than Matlab as a language for the
>> numerical bits (I haven't done Matlab programming to compare), but as a
>> general purpose language it is vastly more powerful for everything else
>> than highly specialised and consequently limited tools like Matlab.  
> 
> I agree, and maybe I wasn't clearly expressing myself. Matlab has a
> little edge if one does linear algebra stuff. There are some weird extra
> parentheses in numpy sometimes (e.g. numpy.zeros((3,4)) vs zeros(3,4) in
> Matlab), numpy does not distinguish row and column vectors and therefore
> leads to more cumbersome code for matrix multiplications, and literals
> also look cleaner in Matlab. In addition, the documentation of Matlab
> and the toolboxes is really high standard, commercial quality and well
> maintained whereas in Scipy you can often see that it is more of a
> "hobbyist" thing.
> 
> But these are minor disadvantages of Python that are a bit annoying in
> interactive use like Jupyter notebooks and not real show-stoppers.
> 
>> All
>> the extra capabilities from Python, such sending emails when your
>> calculations are done, interacting with databases, generating pdf
>> reports from the results, etc., are going to make it a lot more
>> attractive if it can handle the maths you need.
> 
> 
> OTOH, Matlab is a terrible general purpose language. They have bolted on
> to that matrix language everything, you *can* use object orientation,
> general I/O, GUIs and also send emails
> https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/import_export/sending-email.html
> connect databases https://www.mathworks.com/help/database/ug/odbc.html
> and create PDFs
> https://www.mathworks.com/help/rptgen/ug/create-an-html-or-pdf-template.html
> but it often looks quirky and not like a language I would want to write
> a larger program in.
> 
> Python was constructed as a sane language to begin with, but so have
> been Lua, Julia, Ruby, Kotlin, and surely dozens of others. Why Python
> has become the Nr#1? I suspect that as soon as scientists picked it up
> with numpy it grew as an alternative to the de-facto standard Matlab
> simply because it was free. And then the machine learning guys really
> boosted it to a point where it couldn't be ignored any longer.
> 

Lua, Julia, Ruby, etc., are also free.  But Python was there first, and
I think momentum has a lot to do with it.  It's also a higher level
language than, say, Lua, and while there are some mixed opinions on some
aspects of Python's syntax, it is generally regarded as a easier to
read, write and learn than Ruby and many alternatives.

> The same happened years ago with Tcl. Python and Tcl are almost the same
> age. Due to Tk, which allowed non-guru-level programmers to make simple
> GUIs and the adoption of the circuit CAD industry, Tcl became the
> de-facto scripting standard for many years. The decline came with the
> stall of development (Sun pulled the money out) and the main focus has
> shifted away from desktop GUI and circuit board designers. Now it's
> Python that everyone uses and recommends.
> 

Tcl is okay as a "tool control language", but it is far too weak for
more advanced work.  Python was considered too "heavy" for simple
scripting in many areas - but as everything else (disks, memory, cpus,
etc.) has got bigger, the relative cost of Python has dropped.

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-16 14:59 +0200
  Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-16 16:40 +0300
    Re: rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-16 18:24 +0200
      Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-16 17:05 +0000
        Re: rational numbers Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-16 19:58 +0200
        Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-17 09:21 +0200
          Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-17 10:34 +0200
            Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-17 15:55 +0200
              Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-17 17:49 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-17 18:22 +0200
          Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-17 22:07 +1200
            Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-17 13:32 +0200
              Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-18 09:15 +1200
            Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-17 14:06 +0000
      Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-16 20:41 +0200
        Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-16 21:11 +0100
          Re: rational numbers Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-09-16 21:26 +0100
            Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-16 21:54 +0100
            Re: rational numbers "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2021-09-16 23:07 +0200
              Re: rational numbers "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2021-09-16 23:27 +0200
      Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-16 23:12 +0300
        Re: rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-17 09:50 +0200
          Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-17 11:15 +0200
            Re: rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-17 19:19 +0200
              Re: rational numbers James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-17 19:00 -0400
              Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-18 11:39 +0200
                Re: rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-18 11:56 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-18 11:01 +0100
  Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-17 05:36 +0000
    Re: rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-17 09:55 +0200
      Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-17 11:16 +0000
        Re: rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-17 18:33 +0200
        Re: rational numbers Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2021-10-06 13:06 -0700
    Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-17 14:03 +0000
      Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-17 17:12 +0200
        Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-17 17:16 +0200
          Re: rational numbers Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-17 18:59 +0200
            Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-17 17:13 +0000
              Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-19 10:17 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-19 14:07 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-19 15:58 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-19 21:53 +0000
      Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-18 09:34 +1200
        Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-18 12:00 +0200
          Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-18 14:54 +0000
            Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-18 17:36 +0100
              Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-18 23:29 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-19 01:09 +0100
                Re: rational numbers red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2021-09-18 23:45 -0700
              Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-18 22:48 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-19 00:46 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-19 08:06 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-19 10:26 +0100
              Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-19 10:23 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-19 12:04 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-19 16:01 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-19 17:39 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-20 05:25 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-20 10:37 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-22 04:58 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-22 11:26 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-22 23:13 +1200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-22 13:45 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-24 21:37 +1200
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-22 15:29 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-23 07:26 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-19 21:54 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-20 00:31 +0100
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-20 08:33 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-20 16:11 +0100
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-20 18:08 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-20 18:39 +0100
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-20 19:49 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-20 19:04 +0100
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-20 21:35 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-20 21:38 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-21 10:28 +1200
                Re: rational numbers Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2021-09-21 09:08 +0200
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-21 09:39 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 11:12 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-21 15:45 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 14:37 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-21 17:09 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 16:26 +0100
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-21 18:04 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-21 11:51 -0700
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-22 11:09 +0200
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-21 15:38 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-21 15:36 +0000
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-21 15:49 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-21 16:21 +0000
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-22 09:21 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 17:45 +0100
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-21 17:02 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 18:16 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-21 11:53 -0700
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 20:48 +0100
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-21 20:23 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 23:29 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-21 13:47 -0700
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-21 20:11 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 18:33 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-21 20:43 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 18:59 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-21 21:20 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 20:32 +0100
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-21 20:24 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-21 18:52 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2021-09-21 18:34 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-21 01:16 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-21 00:39 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-22 23:45 +0200
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-22 23:51 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-23 18:42 +0200
                Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-23 21:52 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 00:17 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 02:03 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 11:18 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-23 10:26 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 12:21 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 12:40 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-09-23 08:05 -0400
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 15:02 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-24 08:48 +1200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 23:05 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 23:47 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 16:56 -0700
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-24 01:58 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 01:40 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 19:35 -0700
                Re: rational numbers "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 09:07 -0700
                Re: rational numbers "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 09:21 -0700
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-23 14:58 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 17:02 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-23 16:21 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 18:31 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-24 09:12 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-24 12:10 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 11:23 +0000
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-24 15:19 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-24 17:25 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-25 09:27 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-25 11:07 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-25 10:14 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-25 11:53 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-25 11:23 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-25 12:34 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-25 15:37 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-25 15:46 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-25 15:19 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-25 17:16 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-27 23:51 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-27 23:41 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 10:26 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-23 14:04 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-23 17:47 +0200
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-23 17:07 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-23 17:08 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-23 19:30 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-24 10:06 +1200
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-22 05:06 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-22 10:51 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-22 10:54 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-22 11:59 +0100
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-22 11:04 +0000
                Re: rational numbers "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2021-09-22 14:17 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-22 14:32 +0100
                Re: rational numbers "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2021-09-22 16:23 +0200
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-22 15:18 +0300
                Re: rational numbers "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2021-09-22 16:16 +0200
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-22 15:15 +0000
                Re: rational numbers "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2021-09-22 17:57 +0200
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-22 16:05 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-22 14:13 -0700
                Re: rational numbers HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-23 09:01 +0000
                Re: rational numbers James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-23 12:08 -0400
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 10:55 -0700
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-22 20:46 +0300
                Re: rational numbers "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2021-09-22 14:42 -0700
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-23 09:15 +0300
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-22 14:04 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-22 07:18 -0700
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-23 07:31 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-23 11:05 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-23 08:28 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-24 00:51 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-24 04:37 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 07:46 +0000
                Re: rational numbers "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 08:59 -0700
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-24 22:49 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-25 00:55 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-24 12:17 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-27 05:25 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-27 11:37 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-28 04:49 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-23 11:29 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-24 04:38 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-24 11:15 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 10:19 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-27 05:34 +0000
                Re: rational numbers scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-23 14:07 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-23 14:50 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-20 05:20 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-24 21:45 +1200
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-25 16:15 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-27 05:36 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-27 11:19 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-27 21:27 +1300
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-27 15:49 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-28 04:53 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-28 10:16 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-29 12:10 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-29 14:34 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-29 15:54 +0100
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-28 13:23 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-29 10:34 +1300
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-29 12:18 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-29 22:46 +1300
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-29 13:07 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-10-02 22:57 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-29 12:16 +0000
                Re: rational numbers Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-29 20:15 +0300
                Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-30 04:46 +0000
            Re: rational numbers Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-19 11:03 +1200
      Re: rational numbers Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-19 10:12 +0000
  Re: rational numbers Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-23 07:38 -0700
    Re: rational numbers alessandro volturno <alessandro.volturno@libero.it> - 2021-09-24 09:45 +0200
      Re: rational numbers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-24 07:50 +0000
      Re: rational numbers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-24 10:58 +0200
        Re: rational numbers Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-24 02:48 -0700

csiph-web