Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.theory |
| Subject | Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. |
| Date | 2021-07-27 15:04 -0600 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <sdpsdn$uqr$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <20210727183426.00002ff2@reddwarf.jmc> <sdpl8u$upe$1@gioia.aioe.org> <w-WdnVPJxdeRxp38nZ2dnUU7-XXNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
On 7/27/2021 1:14 PM, olcott wrote: > On 7/27/2021 2:02 PM, Peter wrote: <SNIP> > Flibble's reasoning is correct, yet based on my 2016 reasoning. > When the otherwise computationally equivalent TM counter-example cases > are translated into an architecture having finite resources running out > of stack memory would indicate infinite recursion. We just congratulated you on setting a world record in what you are good at: making a mess in your head. We suggested that you retire at this point and rest on your laurels but, no, you just want to extend your unblemished string of nonsense. Lets say you try to evaluate the integer function factorial(10^100000000000000000), where the argument is an integer too. Now this computation runs out of stack memory and you ejaculate "infinite recursion! infinite recursion!" followed by that now famous remark of yours "Polly want a cracker!" Ridiculous. In a few years it might not run out of stack for some definition of "a few" then we can review all of this. Again. Have you ever stopped to think for 10 seconds before typing? You wouldn't know it by what appears in this newsgroup. If I were you, I'd hit the net and find a definition of factorial to parrot in your next message. That would show all of us that you are still on top of your game (though I really can't think of a game simple enough for you to play. Any suggestions out there?) Polly want a cracker? -- Jeff Barnett
Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-27 18:34 +0100
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-27 12:59 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Peter <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2021-07-27 20:02 +0100
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-27 14:14 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-07-27 12:23 -0700
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-27 14:36 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Peter <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2021-07-27 20:46 +0100
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-27 17:13 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-07-27 15:56 -0700
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-27 18:06 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-07-27 16:17 -0700
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-27 20:47 +0100
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-27 16:06 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-28 17:35 +0100
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-28 12:31 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2021-07-27 13:58 -0600
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-27 17:13 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Richard Damon <news.x.richarddamon@xoxy.net> - 2021-07-27 13:05 -0700
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-07-27 13:11 -0700
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-07-27 15:04 -0600
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-27 16:56 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-07-28 00:44 -0600
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-28 08:57 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-28 17:36 +0100
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-28 12:33 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-07-28 11:40 -0600
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-28 12:53 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-07-28 11:25 -0700
csiph-web