Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Richard Damon <news.x.richarddamon@xoxy.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.theory |
| Subject | Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. |
| Date | 2021-07-27 13:05 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <sdpouu$j4m$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <20210727183426.00002ff2@reddwarf.jmc> <sdpl8u$upe$1@gioia.aioe.org> <w-WdnVPJxdeRxp38nZ2dnUU7-XXNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
On 7/27/21 12:14 PM, olcott wrote: > On 7/27/2021 2:02 PM, Peter wrote: >> Mr Flibble wrote: >>> .. due to the infinite recursion missed by Strachey blowing the stack of >>> any turing machine simulator with finite memory (stack) size. One >> >> Turing machines don't have stacks. Stack machines have (of course) >> stacks of limitless length. >> > > Flibble's reasoning is correct, yet based on my 2016 reasoning. > When the otherwise computationally equivalent TM counter-example cases > are translated into an architecture having finite resources running out > of stack memory would indicate infinite recursion. No, that is incorrect. You can make a truly finite machine that exceeds the capability of your finite machine. Thus it is incorrect to say that any machine that exceeds your memory is infinite. You CAN argue that as long as your machine doesn't run out of memory you are equivalent, but if you do, you have lost that claim. Note, that this ALSO requires that your finite equivalents actually are equivalent, which your current system isn't, but so far it hasn't been worth fighting that too much. You WILL need to fix that to make the proof more formal, which will kill your currect test for recursion. > >>> simply needs to detect out of memory when more than one instance of the >>> decider is present in the call stack. >>> >>> This is a troll. >>> >>> Message ends. >>> >>> /Flibble >>> >> >> > >
Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-27 18:34 +0100
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-27 12:59 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Peter <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2021-07-27 20:02 +0100
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-27 14:14 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-07-27 12:23 -0700
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-27 14:36 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Peter <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2021-07-27 20:46 +0100
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-27 17:13 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-07-27 15:56 -0700
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-27 18:06 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-07-27 16:17 -0700
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-27 20:47 +0100
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-27 16:06 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-28 17:35 +0100
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-28 12:31 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2021-07-27 13:58 -0600
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-27 17:13 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Richard Damon <news.x.richarddamon@xoxy.net> - 2021-07-27 13:05 -0700
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-07-27 13:11 -0700
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-07-27 15:04 -0600
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-27 16:56 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-07-28 00:44 -0600
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-28 08:57 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-28 17:36 +0100
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-28 12:33 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-07-28 11:40 -0600
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-28 12:53 -0500
Re: The contradiction that the HP is predicated on is detectable .. Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-07-28 11:25 -0700
csiph-web