Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1474258
| From | Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] [bugfix] replace unnessary ldax with common ldr |
| Date | 2016-09-01 12:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <scxpU-vd-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sbKyR-15N-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sbNdo-2Ps-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <scdUd-2XV-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 02:30:40PM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote: > On 30/08/16 10:07, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 02:35:31PM +0800, Kenneth Lee wrote: > >> (add comment for the previous mail, sorry for the duplication) > >> > >> There is no store_ex pairing with this load_ex. It is not necessary and > >> gave wrong hint to the cache system. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Kenneth Lee <liguozhu@hisilicon.com> > >> --- > >> arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h > >> index c85e96d..3334c4f 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h > >> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock) > >> */ > >> " sevl\n" > >> "2: wfe\n" > >> -" ldaxrh %w2, %4\n" > >> +" ldrh %w2, %4\n" > >> " eor %w1, %w2, %w0, lsr #16\n" > >> " cbnz %w1, 2b\n" > >> /* We got the lock. Critical section starts here. */ > > > > This is needed because the arch_spin_unlock() code only uses an STLR > > without an explicit SEV (like we have on AArch32). An event is > > automatically generated when the exclusive monitor is cleared by STLR. > > But without setting it with a load exclusive in arch_spin_lock() (even > > though it does not acquire the lock), there won't be anything to clear, > > hence no event to be generated. In this case, the WFE would wait > > indefinitely. > > Maybe worth to add this as a comment, no? Yes, we just need to find someone to send a patch ;). -- Catalin
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] [bugfix] replace unnessary ldax with common ldr Kenneth Lee <liguozhu@hisilicon.com> - 2016-08-30 08:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] [bugfix] replace unnessary ldax with common ldr Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-08-30 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] [bugfix] replace unnessary ldax with common ldr Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com> - 2016-08-31 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] [bugfix] replace unnessary ldax with common ldr Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-09-01 12:30 +0200
csiph-web