Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1555874
| From | Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: x86-64: Maintain 16-byte stack alignment |
| Date | 2017-01-10 20:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sYa7E-5fe-37@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sY5KF-2vR-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <sY8yR-4e0-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 10 January 2017 at 14:33, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>> I recently applied the patch
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9468391/
>>
>> and ended up with a boot crash when it tried to run the x86 chacha20
>> code. It turned out that the patch changed a manually aligned
>> stack buffer to one that is aligned by gcc. What was happening was
>> that gcc can stack align to any value on x86-64 except 16. The
>> reason is that gcc assumes that the stack is always 16-byte aligned,
>> which is not actually the case in the kernel.
>>
>
> Apologies for introducing this breakage. It seemed like an obvious and
> simple cleanup, so I didn't even bother to mention it in the commit
> log, but if the kernel does not guarantee 16 byte alignment, I guess
> we should revert to the old method. If SSE instructions are the only
> ones that require this alignment, then I suppose not having a ABI
> conforming stack pointer should not be an issue in general.
Here's what I think is really going on. This is partially from
memory, so I could be off base. The kernel is up against
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53383, which means that,
on some GCC versions (like the bad one and maybe even current ones),
things compiled without -mno-sse can't have the stack alignment set
properly. IMO we should fix this in the affected code, not the entry
code. In fact, I think that fixing it in the entry code won't even
fully fix it because modern GCC will compile the rest of the kernel
with 8-byte alignment and the stack will get randomly unaligned (GCC
4.8 and newer).
Can we just add __attribute__((force_align_arg_pointer)) to the
affected functions? Maybe have:
#define __USES_SSE __attribute__((force_align_arg_pointer))
on affected gcc versions?
***HOWEVER***
I think this is missing the tree for the supposed forest. The actual
affected code appears to be:
static int chacha20_simd(struct blkcipher_desc *desc, struct scatterlist *dst,
struct scatterlist *src, unsigned int nbytes)
{
u32 *state, state_buf[16 + (CHACHA20_STATE_ALIGN / sizeof(u32)) - 1];
...
state = (u32 *)roundup((uintptr_t)state_buf, CHACHA20_STATE_ALIGN);
gcc presumably infers (incorrectly) that state_buf is 16-byte aligned
and optimizes out the roundup. How about just declaring an actual
__aligned(16) buffer, marking the function
__attribute__((force_align_arg_pointer)), and being done with it?
After all, we need that forcible alignment on *all* gcc versions.
--Andy
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
x86-64: Maintain 16-byte stack alignment Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2017-01-10 15:40 +0100
Re: x86-64: Maintain 16-byte stack alignment Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2017-01-10 18:40 +0100
Re: x86-64: Maintain 16-byte stack alignment Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2017-01-10 20:20 +0100
Re: x86-64: Maintain 16-byte stack alignment Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2017-01-10 20:30 +0100
Re: x86-64: Maintain 16-byte stack alignment Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2017-01-10 21:10 +0100
Re: x86-64: Maintain 16-byte stack alignment Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2017-01-11 00:30 +0100
Re: x86-64: Maintain 16-byte stack alignment Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2017-01-11 04:30 +0100
Re: x86-64: Maintain 16-byte stack alignment Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2017-01-11 04:30 +0100
Re: x86-64: Maintain 16-byte stack alignment Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2017-01-10 20:50 +0100
Re: x86-64: Maintain 16-byte stack alignment Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2017-01-11 04:20 +0100
Re: x86-64: Maintain 16-byte stack alignment Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2017-01-11 04:20 +0100
Re: x86-64: Maintain 16-byte stack alignment Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2017-01-12 07:20 +0100
Re: x86-64: Maintain 16-byte stack alignment Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2017-01-12 09:10 +0100
Re: x86-64: Maintain 16-byte stack alignment Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2017-01-12 09:10 +0100
csiph-web