Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1540111

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs tree

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
>
>   fs/logfs/dev_bdev.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   6b4fbde3b979 ("logfs: remove from tree")
>
> from the vfs tree and commitis:
>
>   3a83f4677539 ("block: bio: pass bvec table to bio_init()")
>   739a9975468c ("fs: logfs: convert to bio_add_page() in sync_request()")
>   d4f98a89f9cd ("fs: logfs: use bio_add_page() in __bdev_writeseg()")
>   c12484367865 ("fs: logfs: use bio_add_page() in do_erase()")
>   05aea81b4bc9 ("fs: logfs: remove unnecesary check")
>
> from the block tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I removed the file) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.

Looks every time the logfs changes have been posted in fsdev mail list.

-- 
Ming Lei

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-12-12 02:40 +0100
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs tree Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-12-12 02:50 +0100
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs tree Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 03:10 +0100

csiph-web