Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1540104
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs tree |
| Date | 2016-12-12 02:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sNnKV-6pJ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Jens,
Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
fs/logfs/dev_bdev.c
between commit:
6b4fbde3b979 ("logfs: remove from tree")
from the vfs tree and commitis:
3a83f4677539 ("block: bio: pass bvec table to bio_init()")
739a9975468c ("fs: logfs: convert to bio_add_page() in sync_request()")
d4f98a89f9cd ("fs: logfs: use bio_add_page() in __bdev_writeseg()")
c12484367865 ("fs: logfs: use bio_add_page() in do_erase()")
05aea81b4bc9 ("fs: logfs: remove unnecesary check")
from the block tree.
I fixed it up (I removed the file) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.
Al: that vfs tree commit has a bad email address for Christoph in it :-(
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-12-12 02:40 +0100 Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs tree Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2016-12-12 02:50 +0100 Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs tree Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2016-12-12 03:10 +0100
csiph-web