Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #175167

Re: Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good)

From Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good)
Date 2016-11-28 16:50 +0100
Message-ID <sIwlQ-3V2-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sHu2K-4ya-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sIutH-2IY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sIvSN-3L8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sIwc9-3Rx-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sIwca-3Rx-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 04:35:55PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> I am referring to things like bank accounts, everyday errands, etc.

I would find it rather difficult to access my bank's web-based account
management system without a network connection.  I think the only other
choice would be to walk into their actual brick and mortar location(*).
Telephone may be an option -- I will admit that I have not attempted
to bank by telephone with them since my bank merged with another bank
and now has a different brand name.  But I'm skeptical of it, from past
experiences.

(*) More like steel and glass.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good) Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-25 20:10 +0100
  Re: Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good) Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2016-11-28 14:50 +0100
    Re: Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good) Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-28 15:20 +0100
    Re: Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good) Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2016-11-28 16:20 +0100
      Re: Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good) rhkramer@gmail.com - 2016-11-28 16:40 +0100
        Re: Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good) Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2016-11-28 16:40 +0100
          Re: Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good) Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2016-11-28 16:50 +0100
          Re: Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good) rhkramer@gmail.com - 2016-11-28 17:30 +0100
    Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good) Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.com> - 2016-12-03 19:00 +0100
      Re: Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good) Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2016-12-05 15:00 +0100
        Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good) Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.com> - 2016-12-06 00:20 +0100

csiph-web