Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #175062

Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good)

Show all headers | View raw

On 11/25/16, oldbluebear <nvis@eircom.net> wrote:
>
> This time I  find the current Debian as part of the install process has
> created a "Document" where it wants to save any .doc file.  I do not
> want this, I want them on my Desktop from which I move them manually.
> How do I get rid of this action  which I do not want, As I can see no
> simple way to revert to saving documents on my Desktop which is what I
> want; rather what some spotty faced kid has decided i should have.

Please forgive me if I'm not understanding correctly, but are you
talking about the Document directory under our users (e.g.
/home/user-name/ or ~/). If yes, perhaps you can find an option in
your text editing (or other) software to make your Desktop your
default save-to location for that program?


> My desktop is green (eye safe) no pictures to gobble up CPU  everything
> is stripped down so the AMD multi-core CPU is there to  run my software
> not decorate the screen.
>
> Why can yo not provide that, and then for those who choose it let them
> add all the gizmo stuff that eats CPU, rather than wishing that stuff on
> every installation.

Again please forgive if I'm misunderstanding, but if this is something
related to user accessibility, there is a list dedicated specifically
to that topic. It's what they do:

https://lists.debian.org/debian-accessibility/


> What is LBC ? I am getting screens of stuff that no longer makes sense.

Never heard of it so I tried a quick search of the Net. Landed the
potential phrase, "Linux Binary Compatibility". Does anyone know if
that sounds anywhere near the right ballpark for that acronym?

Cindy :)

-- 
Cindy-Sue Causey
Talking Rock, Pickens County, Georgia, USA

* runs with duct tape *

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good) Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-25 20:10 +0100
  Re: Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good) Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2016-11-28 14:50 +0100
    Re: Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good) Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-11-28 15:20 +0100
    Re: Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good) Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2016-11-28 16:20 +0100
      Re: Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good) rhkramer@gmail.com - 2016-11-28 16:40 +0100
        Re: Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good) Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2016-11-28 16:40 +0100
          Re: Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good) Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2016-11-28 16:50 +0100
          Re: Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good) rhkramer@gmail.com - 2016-11-28 17:30 +0100
    Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good) Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.com> - 2016-12-03 19:00 +0100
      Re: Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good) Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2016-12-05 15:00 +0100
        Document and LBC (Was: Debian *not very good) Jonathan de Boyne Pollard <J.deBoynePollard-newsgroups@NTLWorld.com> - 2016-12-06 00:20 +0100

csiph-web