Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #175155

Re: forcefsck inconsistency

From Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: forcefsck inconsistency
Date 2016-11-28 14:30 +0100
Message-ID <sIual-2Cp-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <sGpeN-365-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGs2Z-4VW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGL5E-rk-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <sHHt0-4DN-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sIu0G-2yY-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, Richard Hector wrote:

> On 26/11/16 22:03, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
>>      According the tune2fs output, the check on / was actually done.
>>      I naïvely looked at syslog to find the checked devices, and I
>> could  not imagine
>>      that the fsck checks are reported in syslog for all partitions, but
>> not for /...
>
> Because / was mounted read-only while being checked, so syslog couldn't
> be written, perhaps?
>
> Richard
>

   hi Richard,
   you are probably right, but I imagine that the available space in memory
   should allow the kernel to store a few lines there, until / is
   re-mounted rw

best regards,
-- 
Pierre Frenkiel

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 20:00 +0100
  Re: forcefsck inconsistency David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-22 20:50 +0100
    Re: forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmx.com> - 2016-11-22 23:50 +0100
      Re: forcefsck inconsistency David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-23 20:10 +0100
        Re: forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmx.com> - 2016-11-26 10:30 +0100
          Re: forcefsck inconsistency Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2016-11-28 14:20 +0100
            Re: forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 14:30 +0100
            Re: forcefsck inconsistency Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2016-11-28 14:50 +0100
              Re: forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 15:20 +0100
                Re: forcefsck inconsistency Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2016-11-28 18:10 +0100
                Re: forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmx.com> - 2016-11-28 20:00 +0100
                Re: forcefsck inconsistency Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2016-11-29 00:20 +0100
                Re: forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmail.com> - 2016-11-29 08:50 +0100
                Re: forcefsck inconsistency Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2016-11-29 12:40 +0100
                Re: forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmx.com> - 2016-11-29 13:50 +0100

csiph-web