Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #175159
| From | Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: forcefsck inconsistency |
| Date | 2016-11-28 15:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sIuWJ-3cd-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <sGs2Z-4VW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGL5E-rk-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <sHHt0-4DN-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sIu0G-2yY-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <sIutI-2IY-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016, Michael Biebl wrote:
> / and /usr are fscked by the initramfs.
> Assuming you use initramfs-tools, which is the default in Debian, you
> can find the log files at
> /run/initramfs/fsck*
>
>
thank you for this usefull information, but some inconsistency remains:
in /run/initramfs/fsck.log, I find:
Log of fsck -C -a -V -t ext4 /dev/sda2
Sat Nov 26 06:53:12 2016
fsck from util-linux 2.25.2
[/sbin/fsck.ext4 (1) -- /dev/sda2] fsck.ext4 -a -C0 /dev/sda2
/dev/sda2: clean, 424229/1679360 files, 3245606/6704384 blocks
Sat Nov 26 06:53:13 2016
----------------
and tune2fs -l /dev/sda2 gives:
Last checked: Fri Nov 25 22:45:38 2016
and on an other PC, the difference is much bigger (24/10/2016 and 17/11/2016)
as for fsck-root, it is empty on both.
best regards,
--
Pierre Frenkiel
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 20:00 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-22 20:50 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmx.com> - 2016-11-22 23:50 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-23 20:10 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmx.com> - 2016-11-26 10:30 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2016-11-28 14:20 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 14:30 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2016-11-28 14:50 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 15:20 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2016-11-28 18:10 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmx.com> - 2016-11-28 20:00 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2016-11-29 00:20 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmail.com> - 2016-11-29 08:50 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2016-11-29 12:40 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmx.com> - 2016-11-29 13:50 +0100
csiph-web