Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #175009
| From | Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | forcefsck inconsistency |
| Date | 2016-11-22 20:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sGosq-2Ad-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
hi everybody,
trying to force the exec of fsck at boot, I found in init.d/checkfs.sh:
if [ -f /forcefsck ] || grep -q -s -w -i "forcefsck" /proc/cmdline
then
force="-f"
else
force=""
fi
So, I typed "touch /forcefsck", and rebooted.
This gave me several strange (IMHO) things
1/ fsck was run on 3 of my 5 ext4 partitions
but not on / (which actually has fs_passno=1)
and not for the 5th partition ,/dev/sdg1, which has fs_passno=2.
I have in syslog:
"EXT4-fs (sdg1): warning: maximal mount count reached, running e2fsck is recommended"
2/ I have in syslog:
"systemd-fsck[2553]: Please pass 'fsck.mode=force' on the kernel
command line rather than creating /forcefsck on the root file system."
Does that mean that the guys working on checkfs.sh and systemd-fsck don't
communicate?
Anyway, I also tried this method, which gave me the same results.
A workaround would be to boot with a live cd, and run fsck manually, but is
there an easier solution?
best regards,
--
Pierre Frenkiel
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 20:00 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-22 20:50 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmx.com> - 2016-11-22 23:50 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-11-23 20:10 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmx.com> - 2016-11-26 10:30 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2016-11-28 14:20 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 14:30 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2016-11-28 14:50 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 15:20 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2016-11-28 18:10 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmx.com> - 2016-11-28 20:00 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2016-11-29 00:20 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmail.com> - 2016-11-29 08:50 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2016-11-29 12:40 +0100
Re: forcefsck inconsistency Pierre Frenkiel <pierre.frenkiel@gmx.com> - 2016-11-29 13:50 +0100
csiph-web