Re: Why do we need reset_control_get_optional() ?

From	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: Why do we need reset_control_get_optional() ?
Date	2016-08-24 16:00 +0200
Message-ID	<s9GSJ-33R-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rY3i1-2br-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <s0ITM-79Q-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <s2J8Z-5cv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <s2Po6-Va-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <s6Jap-1oP-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Am Dienstag, den 16.08.2016, 18:41 +0900 schrieb Masahiro Yamada:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> 2016-08-06 0:35 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>:
> 
> >
> > config RESET_FOO
> >         bool "FOO reset controller" if COMPILE_TEST && !ARCH_FOO
> >         default ARCH_FOO
> >
> > then I think we get both: you won't be able to turn it off
> > but also get the build testing.
>
> This looks good to me, too.
> I do not know if we need "&& !ARCH_FOO", though.
> 
> When we are compile-testing, we do not care if it works on run-time,
> so perhaps it makes sense to allow to enable/disable RESET_FOO
> regardless ARCH_FOO.

I'll send a few patches to add the Kconfig symbols. Turning around the
RESET_CONTROLLER selection can be done in a second step.

regards
Philipp

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Why do we need reset_control_get_optional() ? Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2016-08-16 11:50 +0200
  Re: Why do we need reset_control_get_optional() ? Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> - 2016-08-24 16:00 +0200

csiph-web