Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #80094

Re: lamda-optimization

From David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: lamda-optimization
Date 2021-06-02 17:46 +0200
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <s9893t$f6i$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <nvkebgp3pvkcmbet0auqe3clrjv4p8glcn@4ax.com> <s981cc$jpn$1@dont-email.me> <l43fbg92kfnb5o0ds0qrs9ealae23cbjs9@4ax.com> <s9841l$8bc$1@dont-email.me> <2r5fbg514knubm2mkr93p0qoq2119n91md@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 02/06/2021 16:38, Doctor Who wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:19:32 +0200, David Brown
> <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:
> 
>> On 02/06/2021 15:50, Doctor Who wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 09:34:04 -0400, James Kuyper
>>> <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/2/21 5:49 AM, Doctor Who wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 02 Jun 2021 01:47:58 -0700, Keith Thompson
>>>>> <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>>> if you are not a moderator of this newsgroup please refrain from
>>>>> trying to educate people on how they must behave online.
>>>>
>>>> This is an unmoderated newsgroup, which means that Keith can't do any
>>>> more to stop you from acting rudely than you can do to stop him from
>>>> pointing out your rudeness. Enjoy!
>>>
>>> Thus I am acting rudely because I defend a woman?
>>>
>>
>> You did not "defend a woman" - you /belittled/ a woman.  (Assuming, of
>> course, that Bonita /is/ a woman.)
>>
>> Gender does not matter in programming, or in discussions about
>> programming.  Therefore, any treatment based on gender in a forum about
>> programming is necessarily sexist and prejudice.  It doesn't matter
> 
> 
> the problem at hand is not the forum, but the person which was being
> negated respect, and according to nickname she is a woman.

You are free to complain about people being rude or disrespectful - you
are /not/ free to do so because someone is (or appears to be) a woman.

If you had asked Mr. Spock to be more respectful and polite, that would
have been fine.  But you said he should be respectful because she is a
woman - no other reason.  /That/ is sexist, and disrespectful to Bonita.

How can this be difficult for you to understand?

(I know what it is like to communicate in a language other than one's
mother tongue - if you think the language is an issue, please say so.
You write perfectly good English so I will assume you understand my
language.)

> 
> 
>> whether you are attacking a person for their gender, or defending them
>> because of it.  You have, in essence, been saying that Bonita needs help
>> to argue on the internet because she is merely a woman - it is clearly
>> sexist on your part.
> 
> Yes! and I am free to help anybody I want to help.
> 

You are free to help - you are not free to be sexist (or bigoted in
other ways) without being called out.

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: lamda-optimization red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2021-05-31 12:41 -0700
  Re: lamda-optimization Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-06-01 06:15 +0200
    Re: lamda-optimization Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-06-01 15:24 +0200
      Re: lamda-optimization Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-06-01 09:04 -0700
        Re: lamda-optimization Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-06-01 18:42 +0200
      Re: lamda-optimization red floyd <no.spam@its.invalid> - 2021-06-01 20:26 -0700
        Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 05:33 +0200
    Re: lamda-optimization Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-06-01 14:51 +0200
  Re: lamda-optimization Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-06-01 07:10 +0000
    Re: lamda-optimization Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-06-01 10:29 +0100
    Re: lamda-optimization MrSpook_x510g@6uikovuenojv.gov.uk - 2021-06-01 18:27 +0000
      Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 05:10 +0200
        Re: lamda-optimization James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-06-02 00:14 -0400
          Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 07:26 +0200
            Re: lamda-optimization Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-06-02 01:47 -0700
              Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 11:49 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-06-02 09:34 -0400
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 15:50 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 16:28 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-06-02 14:45 +0000
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 17:58 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-06-02 10:14 -0400
                Re: lamda-optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-06-02 16:19 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 16:30 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 16:38 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-06-02 17:46 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 18:00 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-06-02 10:17 -0700
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 19:30 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-06-02 10:11 -0700
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 19:30 +0200
          Re: lamda-optimization David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-06-02 09:39 +0200
            Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 10:23 +0200
              Re: lamda-optimization "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-06-02 11:38 -0700
            Re: lamda-optimization James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-06-02 10:15 -0400
              Re: lamda-optimization Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-06-02 19:01 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization Doctor Who <doc@tardis.org> - 2021-06-02 19:30 +0200
                Re: lamda-optimization "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-06-02 11:39 -0700
        Re: lamda-optimization scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-06-02 14:21 +0000
          Re: lamda-optimization MrSpook_2TF@zp_6z10zl3.info - 2021-06-03 08:12 +0000
      Re: lamda-optimization Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-06-02 05:05 +0000
        Re: lamda-optimization MrSpook_9na7kf9y25@bv5tkwx.biz - 2021-06-03 08:10 +0000

csiph-web