Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Unison |
| Date | 2014-03-19 22:18 +0100 |
| Organization | PostgreSQL and SQLite |
| Message-ID | <s6epva-5mp.ln1@news.chingola.ch> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <20140317113115.a906c6a3.rsw@therandymon.com> <867g7tatub.fsf@nine.des.no> <20140317133233.c15fa1ba.rsw@therandymon.com> <170320141757350528%timstreater@greenbee.net> <1050494277416779016.923990bob_davis_retired-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> |
On 2014-03-17, Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> wrote: > Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> wrote: >> In article <20140317133233.c15fa1ba.rsw@therandymon.com>, RS Wood >> <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 13:32:44 +0100 >>> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no> wrote: >>>>> RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> writes: >>>>> Or rather, that "Rich Text" is as "low" as you should go. OSX seems >>>>> to prefer RichText as a lowest common denominator, which for most >>>>> purposes, is probably correct and even helpful. >>>>>> The lowest common denominator is always 1 (for numbers) or plain text >>>> (for text formatting). Perhaps you mean s/lowest/greatest/? >> >>> No, I mean that the developers of OSX choose RichText for *their* lowest >>> common denominator, thinking "why would anyone ever want plain text?" > >>> Whereas, for Usenet, plain text is the correct format. That would explain >>> why OSX would facilitate rich text format in things like copy-paste. >>> Unix on the other hands prefers plain text, as do I, in a nice, ugly, >>> monospaced font :) >> >> WTF are you talking about? It sounds to me like you're talking utter, >> utter shite. > > > Actually he is on the right track. When you copy formatted text in OS X > the OS will attempt to preserve the formatting. If you paste the text into > an NSTextField (or whatever they are calling it now) which is capable of > holding formatted text, the OS will format the text so as to best match the > formatting of the source. The problem with that for me is that I usually want the paste to match the style of the target, not the source. What I too often end up doing is a paste - dammit wrong format - Undo - Paste and Match Style. The keyboard shortcut for that is shift-alt-command-V which I never remember (not sure it's consistent across apps but might be), so I use the menus. A tip I found recently was to swap the shortcut keys around so that command-V gives Paste and Match Style, and the complex one does a paste with source format. Must see if I can dig that out and see how well it works in practice. > I know this sounds crazy, most OSs and windowing environments have such > primitive clipboards that it seems like magic, but this is old 80s tech > developed in Nextstep. The default is more suitable for things like DTP than my usage, so I see where it might have come from. -- Paul Sture "In that case," said Napoleon, "let us wait twenty minutes; when the enemy is making a false movement we must take good care not to interrupt him."
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Imagine a geodesic rotating array of orbiting servers RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-03-12 14:29 +0000
Re: Imagine a geodesic rotating array of orbiting servers Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-13 14:21 -0700
Re: Imagine a geodesic rotating array of orbiting servers Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2014-03-13 22:47 +0000
Re: Imagine a geodesic rotating array of orbiting servers Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-13 15:50 -0700
Re: Imagine a geodesic rotating array of orbiting servers Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-03-14 01:43 +0000
Re: Imagine a geodesic rotating array of orbiting servers greymausg <maus@mail.com> - 2014-03-14 11:55 +0000
Re: Imagine a geodesic rotating array of orbiting servers RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-03-14 19:35 +0000
Re: Imagine a geodesic rotating array of orbiting servers Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-14 13:24 -0700
Unison RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-03-14 21:52 +0000
Re: Unison RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-03-15 14:57 +0000
Re: Unison Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-16 18:16 -0700
Re: Unison RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-03-17 11:31 +0000
Re: Unison Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no> - 2014-03-17 13:32 +0100
Re: Unison RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-03-17 13:32 +0000
Re: Unison Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-03-17 17:57 +0000
Re: Unison Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-17 18:19 +0000
Re: Unison Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-17 20:01 +0000
Re: Unison Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-03-17 21:15 +0000
Re: Unison Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-17 21:29 +0000
Re: Unison Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-03-17 21:37 +0000
Re: Unison Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-18 15:20 +0000
Re: Unison Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-18 19:14 +0000
Re: Unison Rob Myers <rob@robmyers.org> - 2014-03-18 20:01 +0000
Re: Unison Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-18 23:11 +0000
Re: Unison Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-03-19 22:18 +0100
Re: Unison Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-03-19 23:14 +0100
Re: Unison Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-03-19 23:04 +0000
csiph-web