Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1391579
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues |
| Date | 2016-04-30 10:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rtxYL-3Vo-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <rtmTE-3yl-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rtmTE-3yl-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rtn3k-3Ce-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rtncZ-3HL-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rtnwn-3Q2-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
* Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> wrote: > But I also think it would be pretty nice if 'ls' didn't pay the 2k cost to have > AVX-512 state if it's not using AVX-512. [...] A C library might decide to use AVX-512 memset(). RAM is cheap, while allocation complexity, especially in the kernel, has various other costs. I mean, we should not worry about per thread allocation sizes that can be compared to the kernel stack size. We can still use the compacted area handling instructions, because presumably those are the fastest and are also the most optimized ones? But I wouldn't use them to do dynamic allocation: just allocate the maximum possible FPU save area at task creation time and never again worry about that detail. Ok? Thanks, Ingo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-29 20:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-04-29 21:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-29 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> - 2016-04-29 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-04-29 22:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-29 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-04-29 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-30 00:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-04-30 10:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-05-02 18:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-05-02 20:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-29 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> - 2016-04-29 22:10 +0200
csiph-web