Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues

From	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues
Date	2016-04-29 22:50 +0200
Message-ID	<rtnwn-3Q2-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <rtl1w-1Wz-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rtmTE-3yl-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rtmTE-3yl-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rtn3k-3Ce-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rtncZ-3HL-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 04/29/2016 01:25 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 01:03:43PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>>> That's not feasible.  Think of dynamic libraries or just-in-time
>>> compilers.  What instruction set does /usr/bin/java use, for instance? :)
>>
>> The java argument is true. In that case or when the bitmask is
>> missing, we can allocate for all supported features.
> 
> I actually want to see us moving in the direction of unconditionally
> allocating everything on process startup.  If we can stop using CR0.TS
> entirely, I think everything will be better.

We can absolutely allocate the worst-case XSAVE buffer at task startup
for folks that never want to see a latency spike in the life of the app
no matter what.

But I also think it would be pretty nice if 'ls' didn't pay the 2k cost
to have AVX-512 state if it's not using AVX-512.  We also don't have to
do this with CR0.TS.  We'd actually use a combination of out-of-line
(not appended to task_struct) XSAVE buffers and XGETBV1 to check the
size of our XSAVE buffer before we call XSAVE* and resize it when needed.

Maybe nobody will ever care enough about 2kbytes/thread, though.

Thread

Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-29 20:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-04-29 21:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-29 22:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> - 2016-04-29 22:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-04-29 22:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-29 22:50 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-04-29 22:50 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-30 00:50 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-04-30 10:00 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-05-02 18:30 +0200
              Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-05-02 20:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-29 22:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v4 0/10] x86/xsaves: Fix XSAVES known issues Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> - 2016-04-29 22:10 +0200

csiph-web