Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1391721
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] efibc: avoid stack overflow warning |
| Date | 2016-05-01 01:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rtMuK-7Od-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rtkIa-1vq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rtLIm-78D-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rtLS1-7cr-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Saturday 30 April 2016 23:46:41 Matt Fleming wrote: > > > It's not something we'd have to worry about in practice, but it does > > make my patch incorrect. Should we come up with a different way to > > do it? > > Jeremy proposed a patch to dynamically allocate the memory, which I > think is the correct way to go given that our (reasonable) assumptions > about reboot notifier concurrency are not guaranteed, > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87h9eked24.fsf@jcompost-MOBL1.tl.intel.com Sure, that works. I considered doing it that way but it seemed more complicated. Please use that patch instead of mine. Arnd
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] efibc: avoid stack overflow warning Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-04-29 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] efibc: avoid stack overflow warning Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-04-30 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] efibc: avoid stack overflow warning Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-05-01 00:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] efibc: avoid stack overflow warning Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-05-01 00:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] efibc: avoid stack overflow warning Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-05-01 01:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] efibc: avoid stack overflow warning Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-05-01 15:20 +0200
csiph-web