Re: [PATCH] efibc: avoid stack overflow warning

From	Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] efibc: avoid stack overflow warning
Date	2016-05-01 15:20 +0200
Message-ID	<rtZrX-1EF-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rtkIa-1vq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rtLIm-78D-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rtLS1-7cr-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rtMuK-7Od-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, 01 May, at 01:25:12AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 30 April 2016 23:46:41 Matt Fleming wrote:
> > 
> > > It's not something we'd have to worry about in practice, but it does
> > > make my patch incorrect. Should we come up with a different way to
> > > do it?
> > 
> > Jeremy proposed a patch to dynamically allocate the memory, which I
> > think is the correct way to go given that our (reasonable) assumptions
> > about reboot notifier concurrency are not guaranteed,
> > 
> >   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87h9eked24.fsf@jcompost-MOBL1.tl.intel.com
> 
> Sure, that works. I considered doing it that way but it seemed more
> complicated. Please use that patch instead of mine.

Thanks Ard!

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH] efibc: avoid stack overflow warning Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-04-29 19:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] efibc: avoid stack overflow warning Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-04-30 22:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] efibc: avoid stack overflow warning Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-05-01 00:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] efibc: avoid stack overflow warning Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-05-01 00:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] efibc: avoid stack overflow warning Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-05-01 01:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] efibc: avoid stack overflow warning Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-05-01 15:20 +0200

csiph-web