Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: max77693: Allow building as a module

From	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: max77693: Allow building as a module
Date	2016-04-08 09:20 +0200
Message-ID	<rlyRY-eV-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rk7Au-8hT-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rlika-4wu-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rlvKq-6c1-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, 08 Apr 2016, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 02:29:47PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 04 Apr 2016, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > 
> > > The consumer of max77693 regulators on Trats2 board (samsung-usb2-phy
> > > driver) supports deferred probing so the max77693 main MFD driver can be
> > > built now as a module. This gives more flexibility and removes manual
> > > ordering of init calls.
> > > 
> > > Suggested-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> > > Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/mfd/Kconfig    |  4 ++--
> > >  drivers/mfd/max77693.c | 14 ++------------
> > >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > 
> > I assume this can be taken immediately and doesn't depend on anything
> > external to the set?
> > 
> > For my own reference:
> >   Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Yes, this can be taken as is. Only second patch (changing defconfig)
> depends on this. I can take the second patch through samsung tree but
> that would require a tag/branch with this... which looks like an
> overkill. So maybe you would take both?

If I take the defconfig patch without a tag, there will almost
certainly be merge conflicts.  Other solutions include; delaying the
defconfig patch for one cycle or trying to get it in post -rc1.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Thread

[PATCH 1/2] mfd: max77693: Allow building as a module Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2016-04-04 10:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: max77693: Allow building as a module Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-04-05 16:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: max77693: Allow building as a module Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-04-07 15:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: max77693: Allow building as a module Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2016-04-08 06:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: max77693: Allow building as a module Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-04-08 09:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: max77693: Allow building as a module Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2016-04-10 10:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: max77693: Allow building as a module Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-04-11 10:10 +0200

csiph-web