Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1368300
| From | Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] gpio: dwapb: convert device node to fwnode |
| Date | 2016-03-31 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <riKPE-5Ha-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rgM9b-2uM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rgM9b-2uM-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <ri4Qq-sQ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rimDD-4Gg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <riz7P-55Z-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Jiang Qiu <qiujiang@huawei.com> wrote: > 在 2016/3/30 19:38, Andy Shevchenko 写道: >>> One suggestion for both patches: you could remove name from struct >>> dwapb_port_property and get rid of pp->name and nobody would miss it. >>> All it is used for is some dev_err's so the device info gets printed >>> anyway. For example (if I leave the irq out of the DT) >>> >>> gpio-dwapb ff708000.gpio: no irq for bank /soc/gpio@ff708000/gpio-controller@0 >>> >>> is redundant. The only additional info here from the name is the port >>> index. That could be added to the messages without having to get the >>> name through the two property/of methods. >>> >> >> Good suggestion! That'll make patches and code cleaner. >> >> Perhaps separate prepended patch? >> > Hi Alan/Andy, > > It sounds good, I will follow this suggestion and do a test. But, what's the > "separate prepended patch" mean? Preparatory patch which goes first in the series. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v6 0/2] gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support for power button qiujiang <qiujiang@huawei.com> - 2016-03-26 03:30 +0100
[PATCH v6 2/2] gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support qiujiang <qiujiang@huawei.com> - 2016-03-26 03:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 13:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support Jiang Qiu <qiujiang@huawei.com> - 2016-03-31 03:00 +0200
[PATCH v6 1/2] gpio: dwapb: convert device node to fwnode qiujiang <qiujiang@huawei.com> - 2016-03-26 03:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] gpio: dwapb: convert device node to fwnode Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] gpio: dwapb: convert device node to fwnode Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 13:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] gpio: dwapb: convert device node to fwnode Jiang Qiu <qiujiang@huawei.com> - 2016-03-31 03:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] gpio: dwapb: convert device node to fwnode Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 15:30 +0200
csiph-web