Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #556411

Re: A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment

From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment
Date 2016-02-25 03:54 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <rga2qc-07o.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References <8950ff72-b9c4-46a6-a0be-e04aab0a1f98@googlegroups.com> <cop1qc-mbm.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <0a5f15a5-95dd-45aa-a3a0-43337b02c90f@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 at 3:16:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
> The argument is over anyways.

Did you start seeing a mental health professional that helped you see
the error of your delusions or have your delusions caused you to come
to the false conclusion I agree with your nonsense?


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 12:42 -0800
  Re: A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-24 15:40 -0600
  Re: A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-24 23:08 +0000
    Re: A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 18:49 -0800
      Re: A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-24 19:13 -0800
        Re: A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-24 19:18 -0800
      Re: A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-25 03:54 +0000
        Re: A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 22:56 -0800
          Re: A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-25 08:49 -0600
      Re: A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-25 17:57 +0000

csiph-web