Re: A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment

From	moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment
Date	2016-02-25 17:57 +0000
Organization	The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID	<nanf9o$ogp$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References	<8950ff72-b9c4-46a6-a0be-e04aab0a1f98@googlegroups.com> <cop1qc-mbm.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <0a5f15a5-95dd-45aa-a3a0-43337b02c90f@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> writes:

>On Wednesday, February 24, 2016 at 3:16:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

>The argument is over anyways.

I'm glad you finally admit you lost, Jim.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 12:42 -0800
  Re: A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-24 15:40 -0600
  Re: A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-24 23:08 +0000
    Re: A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 18:49 -0800
      Re: A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-24 19:13 -0800
        Re: A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-24 19:18 -0800
      Re: A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-25 03:54 +0000
        Re: A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 22:56 -0800
          Re: A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-25 08:49 -0600
      Re: A Simpler Alternative to Penino's Suggested Experiment moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-25 17:57 +0000

csiph-web