Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1438939
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] ACPI / processor_idle: Add ACPI v6.0 LPI support |
| Date | 2016-07-07 23:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rSoIx-3Po-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rSl7X-1t6-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote: > ACPI 6.0 introduced LPI(Low Power Idle) states that provides an alternate > method to describe processor idle states. It extends the specification > to allow the expression of idle states like C-states selectable by the > OSPM when a processor goes idle, but may affect more than one processor, > and may affect other system components. > > LPI extensions leverages the processor container device(again introduced > in ACPI 6.0) allowing to express which parts of the system are affected > by a given LPI state. It defines the local power states for each node > in a hierarchical processor topology. The OSPM can use _LPI object to > select a local power state for each level of processor hierarchy in the > system. They used to produce a composite power state request that is > presented to the platform by the OSPM. > > Since multiple processors affect the idle state for any non-leaf hierarchy > node, coordination of idle state requests between the processors is > required. ACPI supports two different coordination schemes: Platform > coordinated and OS initiated. > > This series aims at providing basic and initial support for platform > coordinated LPI states. > > v7[7]->v8: > - Replaced HAVE_GENERIC_CPUIDLE_ENTER with CPU_IDLE_ENTER_WRAPPED > macro, which is more cleaner and definately less confusing :) > (Thanks to Rafael for the suggestion) Patches [3-6/6] definitely look a lot cleaner to me now. :-) That said, the name of the macro I suggested was just an example, so if people don't like this one, it'd be fine to change it as far as I'm concerned. Thanks, Rafael
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v8 0/6] ACPI / processor_idle: Add ACPI v6.0 LPI support Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-07-07 19:20 +0200
[PATCH v8 1/6] ACPI / processor_idle: introduce ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-07-07 19:20 +0200
[PATCH v8 3/6] arm64: cpuidle: drop __init section marker to arm_cpuidle_init Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-07-07 19:20 +0200
[PATCH v8 4/6] cpuidle: introduce CPU_IDLE_ENTER_WRAPPED macro for ARM{32,64} Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-07-07 19:20 +0200
[PATCH v8 5/6] arm64: add support for ACPI Low Power Idle(LPI) Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-07-07 19:20 +0200
[PATCH v8 6/6] ACPI : enable ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE on ARM64 Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-07-07 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 5/6] arm64: add support for ACPI Low Power Idle(LPI) Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2016-07-08 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 5/6] arm64: add support for ACPI Low Power Idle(LPI) Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-07-08 17:30 +0200
[PATCH v8 2/6] ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) states Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-07-07 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] ACPI / processor_idle: Add ACPI v6.0 LPI support "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-07-07 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] ACPI / processor_idle: Add ACPI v6.0 LPI support Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-07-08 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] ACPI / processor_idle: Add ACPI v6.0 LPI support Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2016-07-08 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] ACPI / processor_idle: Add ACPI v6.0 LPI support Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-07-08 17:30 +0200
csiph-web