Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1435658
| From | Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: fix acpi_parse_entries_array() so it traverses all subtables |
| Date | 2016-07-02 00:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rQeDD-3pK-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rQeaB-3g8-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rQeaB-3g8-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rQekh-3jb-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rQetY-3mA-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rQetY-3mA-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Red Hat, Inc. |
On 07/01/2016 03:46 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> wrote: >> On 07/01/2016 03:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> Without this patch, the acpi_parse_entries_array() function will return >>>> the very first time there is any error found in either the array of >>>> callback functions or if one of the callbacks returns an non-zero value. >>>> However, the array of callbacks could still have valid entries further >>>> on in the array, or the callbacks may be able to process subsequent >>>> subtables without error. The change here makes the function consistent >>>> with its description so that it will properly return the sum of all >>>> matching entries for all proc handlers, instead of stopping abruptly >>>> as it does today. >>> >>> I'm not sure I follow. >>> >>> You seem to be saying that the function should process all of the >>> subtables etc even though errors have been found for some of them, but >>> it still will return an error in the end if there are any errors. How >>> exactly does it help to continue processing in case of an error, then? >> >> The use case I have in mind is to simply count all of the subtables of >> a certain type. If for some reason, the callback -- or any other callback >> -- fails, the traversal of all the subtables stops immediately. So, I >> could have two callbacks, and if the first one fails on the first subtable >> of its type, traversal stops. The count for the second callback will be >> zero which may or may not be correct. > > It will be zero, because the callback has not been invoked at all. > Why is this incorrect? > Because there could be additional subtables after the one causing a failure that the second callback could have counted; e.g., if the failure is on the first subtable of 20 in the MADT, the following 19 would be ignored, even if they were all the right subtype for the second callback. -- ciao, al ----------------------------------- Al Stone Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. ahs3@redhat.com -----------------------------------
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 2/3] ACPI: fix acpi_parse_entries_array() so it traverses all subtables Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> - 2016-07-01 23:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: fix acpi_parse_entries_array() so it traverses all subtables "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-07-01 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: fix acpi_parse_entries_array() so it traverses all subtables Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> - 2016-07-01 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: fix acpi_parse_entries_array() so it traverses all subtables "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-07-01 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: fix acpi_parse_entries_array() so it traverses all subtables Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> - 2016-07-02 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: fix acpi_parse_entries_array() so it traverses all subtables "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-07-02 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: fix acpi_parse_entries_array() so it traverses all subtables Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> - 2016-07-02 01:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: fix acpi_parse_entries_array() so it traverses all subtables "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-07-02 01:30 +0200
csiph-web