Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1435653

Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: fix acpi_parse_entries_array() so it traverses all subtables

From "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: fix acpi_parse_entries_array() so it traverses all subtables
Date 2016-07-01 23:50 +0200
Message-ID <rQetY-3mA-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rQeaB-3g8-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rQeaB-3g8-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rQekh-3jb-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rQetY-3mA-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/01/2016 03:32 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Without this patch, the acpi_parse_entries_array() function will return
>>> the very first time there is any error found in either the array of
>>> callback functions or if one of the callbacks returns an non-zero value.
>>> However, the array of callbacks could still have valid entries further
>>> on in the array, or the callbacks may be able to process subsequent
>>> subtables without error.  The change here makes the function consistent
>>> with its description so that it will properly return the sum of all
>>> matching entries for all proc handlers, instead of stopping abruptly
>>> as it does today.
>>
>> I'm not sure I follow.
>>
>> You seem to be saying that the function should process all of the
>> subtables etc even though errors have been found for some of them, but
>> it still will return an error in the end if there are any errors.  How
>> exactly does it help to continue processing in case of an error, then?
>
> The use case I have in mind is to simply count all of the subtables of
> a certain type.  If for some reason, the callback -- or any other callback
> -- fails, the traversal of all the subtables stops immediately.  So, I
> could have two callbacks, and if the first one fails on the first subtable
> of its type, traversal stops.  The count for the second callback will be
> zero which may or may not be correct.

It will be zero, because the callback has not been invoked at all.
Why is this incorrect?

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 2/3] ACPI: fix acpi_parse_entries_array() so it traverses all subtables Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> - 2016-07-01 23:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: fix acpi_parse_entries_array() so it traverses  all subtables "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-07-01 23:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: fix acpi_parse_entries_array() so it traverses  all subtables Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> - 2016-07-01 23:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: fix acpi_parse_entries_array() so it traverses  all subtables "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-07-01 23:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: fix acpi_parse_entries_array() so it traverses  all subtables Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> - 2016-07-02 00:00 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: fix acpi_parse_entries_array() so it traverses  all subtables "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-07-02 00:10 +0200
            Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: fix acpi_parse_entries_array() so it traverses  all subtables Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> - 2016-07-02 01:10 +0200
              Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: fix acpi_parse_entries_array() so it traverses  all subtables "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-07-02 01:30 +0200

csiph-web