Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1413193
| From | Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add DT binding details |
| Date | 2016-06-03 14:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rFWyl-39X-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rFdKW-8sS-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <rFMIG-5xl-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rFUmS-1Sf-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <rFW5j-2Y2-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rFWf0-32g-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Friday 03 June 2016 05:41 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 03/06/16 12:48, Laxman Dewangan wrote: >> On Friday 03 June 2016 03:49 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >>>>> + >>>>> +enable-power-monitor: Boolean, Enable power monitoring of the device. >>> Is this the power good stuff? description should be more detailed. >> If there is no shunt resistance then we can not enable power monitor >> on that rail. Device does not mandate to have shunt and so this is >> based on platforms. > The voltage shunt also becomes meaningless (unless you have other very > small voltage drops to measure!). So drop that channel as well. > Either it is there to do current measurement or it isn't. OK. understood. >>>>> + >>>>> +enable-continuous-mode: Boolean. Device support oneshot and continuous >>>>> + mode for the channel data conversion. Presence >>>>> + of this property will enable the continuous >>>>> + mode from boot. >>> Is the difference between driver load time and the point where usespace can >>> set it up significant enough to justify this? >> We change the mode dynamically. If we have more core then goto the >> continuous mode so that we can apply throttling if power consumption >> is going more than requirement. If we are running single core then >> change to oneshot mode. > That's definitely a usespace or firmware decision, not a kernel one > to my mind - unless I guess you an enforcing bringing this device up > before firing up the additional cores? > > Then it's nasty but I can start to see some justification. Yaah, this is FW decision. Our need on some platform was that start the driver with the continuous mode. But I think that may be specific need. I can remove this and let user space can enable the continuous mode.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add DT binding details Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-06-01 14:50 +0200
[PATCH 2/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add support for IIO ADC driver for TI INA3221 Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-06-01 14:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add support for IIO ADC driver for TI INA3221 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> - 2016-06-03 12:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add support for IIO ADC driver for TI INA3221 Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-06-03 13:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add support for IIO ADC driver for TI INA3221 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> - 2016-06-03 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add support for IIO ADC driver for TI INA3221 Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-06-03 14:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add support for IIO ADC driver for TI INA3221 Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-06-03 13:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add support for IIO ADC driver for TI INA3221 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> - 2016-06-03 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add support for IIO ADC driver for TI INA3221 Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-06-03 14:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add support for IIO ADC driver for TI INA3221 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-06-03 15:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add support for IIO ADC driver for TI INA3221 Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-06-03 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add support for IIO ADC driver for TI INA3221 "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2016-06-03 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add support for IIO ADC driver for TI INA3221 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-06-08 00:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add support for IIO ADC driver for TI INA3221 "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2016-06-08 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add support for IIO ADC driver for TI INA3221 Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-06-08 18:00 +0200
[PATCH 3/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add sysfs details for TI INA3221 Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-06-01 14:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add sysfs details for TI INA3221 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> - 2016-06-03 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add DT binding details Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-06-03 04:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add DT binding details Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-06-03 11:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add DT binding details Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> - 2016-06-03 12:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add DT binding details Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-06-03 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add DT binding details Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> - 2016-06-03 14:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add DT binding details Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-06-03 14:40 +0200
csiph-web