Re: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: ARMv7-M uses BE-8, not BE-32

From	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: ARMv7-M uses BE-8, not BE-32
Date	2016-02-19 11:20 +0100
Message-ID	<r3Qkh-3vx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<r3xrj-6Oj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3zta-88d-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3OVd-2o2-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Friday 19 February 2016 08:47:47 Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> Ah, it explains why my quick attempt to enable BE for MPS2 (M-class
> platform) failed. With this patch applied I'm able to see Linux booting
> on MPS2 FVP model in BE, not complete boot but it might be due to other
> reasons. So this patch definitely improves things for me, if it helps
> 
> Tested-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
> 

Awesome, thanks for testing!

	Arnd

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 1/9] ARM: ARMv7-M uses BE-8, not BE-32 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-18 15:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: ARMv7-M uses BE-8, not BE-32 Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2016-02-18 17:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: ARMv7-M uses BE-8, not BE-32 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-18 17:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: ARMv7-M uses BE-8, not BE-32 Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com> - 2016-02-19 09:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: ARMv7-M uses BE-8, not BE-32 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-19 11:20 +0100

csiph-web