Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1337502

Re: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: ARMv7-M uses BE-8, not BE-32

Show all headers | View raw

On Thursday 18 February 2016 11:06:08 Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> > When configuring the kernel for big-endian, we set either BE-8 or BE-32
> > based on the CPU architecture level. Until linux-4.4, we did not have
> > any ARMv7-M platform allowing big-endian builds, but now i.MX/Vybrid
> > is in that category, adn we get a build error because of this:
> > 
> > arch/arm/kernel/module-plts.c: In function 'get_module_plt':
> > arch/arm/kernel/module-plts.c:60:46: error: implicit declaration of function '__opcode_to_mem_thumb32' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 
> > This comes down to picking the wrong default, ARMv7-M uses BE8
> > like ARMv7-A does. Changing the default gets the kernel to compile
> > and presumably works.
> 
> Was it tested without BE8 when it was submitted upstream? I don't think 
> you can switch this freely on a given hardware platform and expect it to 
> still work.
> 
> 

mach-imx contains a number of different SoCs, and one SoC was recently
tested successfully after a number of endianess bugs got fixed. This was
an i.mx6 using a Cortex-A9 core, but we are now also able to build
vybrid vf610 big-endian based on that selection. This SoC supports
Linux running either on its Cortex-A5 or its Cortex-M3 (or M4?) cores.

I am rather sure nobody has ever run Linux in big-endian mode on the
Cortex-M platform, specifically because it was always wrong and could
not be enabled in Kconfig.

	Arnd

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 1/9] ARM: ARMv7-M uses BE-8, not BE-32 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-18 15:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: ARMv7-M uses BE-8, not BE-32 Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2016-02-18 17:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: ARMv7-M uses BE-8, not BE-32 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-18 17:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: ARMv7-M uses BE-8, not BE-32 Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com> - 2016-02-19 09:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: ARMv7-M uses BE-8, not BE-32 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-02-19 11:20 +0100

csiph-web