Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.devel.release > #61104
| From | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.maint.boot |
| Subject | Re: Kernel version for stretch |
| Date | 2016-02-15 13:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r2qie-Lf-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <qXDSN-7AO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qYEWt-2Kf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qYTCa-3TO-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <r27fA-4zJ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <r2bMe-7Rl-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Sun, 2016-02-14 at 15:48 -0500, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> [2016-02-14 15:58]: > > > * If we stick with 4.4, the Debian Linux maintainers receives > > > practically no advantage from Greg's LTS effort. > > > > No, we would benefit from that but this is very early to freeze the > > kernel and we would need to do a lot of work on backporting hardware > > support. > > Based on my gut feeling, backporting stuff into 4.4 would be more work > than doing a long-term stable release based on 4.9. Based on your > experience, do you think that's accurate, Ben? I think they're around the same amount of effort. > (I think it would be different if we were to use 4.4 when 4.5 was the > current kernel, but 4.4 to 4.10 is going to be a huge delta.) > > So imho we should get 4.9 into unstable, agree at some point on 4.9 vs > 4.10 and if we agree on 4.10 then get 4.10-rc releases into unstable, > and ask people to test daily d-i images based on that. Yes, that's a good way to reduce the risk of a late switch. > (Of course I should mention that I'm not part of the kernel team. But > speaking as an ARM porter, I think going with 4.4 would be a disaster. > We're going to see a lot of changes this year, especially on ARM64.) I know. > Another option would be to go with 4.4 and make it easy for d-i to > support kernels from backports (something we should do anyway). But I > think releasing with a 1.5 year old kernel is just going to add to the > "Debian is out of date" view. There's that too. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings The most exhausting thing in life is being insincere. - Anne Morrow Lindberg
Back to linux.debian.devel.release | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-27 19:30 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-01-28 20:10 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-28 21:20 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-01-30 15:40 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org> - 2016-02-07 02:00 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch maximilian attems <maks@stro.at> - 2016-01-29 00:10 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-01-30 15:40 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch maximilian attems <maks@stro.at> - 2016-01-30 18:40 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2016-02-02 08:50 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2016-02-02 14:30 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Karsten Merker <merker@debian.org> - 2016-02-03 08:40 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2016-02-03 19:40 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> - 2016-02-04 04:40 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Karsten Merker <merker@debian.org> - 2016-02-03 08:30 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2016-02-04 10:20 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2016-02-04 17:50 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Michael Gilbert <mgilbert@debian.org> - 2016-02-05 01:20 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> - 2016-02-05 10:30 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-02-05 04:10 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2016-02-05 19:50 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-02-14 17:00 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> - 2016-02-14 21:50 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-02-15 13:20 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org> - 2016-02-15 09:50 +0100
[Decision] Kernel version for stretch Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2016-02-24 22:50 +0100
Re: [Decision] Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-03-02 12:30 +0100
csiph-web