Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.devel.release > #60971
| From | Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.maint.boot |
| Subject | Re: Kernel version for stretch |
| Date | 2016-02-05 19:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qYTCa-3TO-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qVD0S-7IE-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXDSN-7AO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qYEWt-2Kf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Ben Hutchings:
> On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 07:34 +0000, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Would you prefer that we moved future freezes (i.e. Buster and later),
>> so we could always rely on Greg's branch?
>
> Yes, I would.
>
Ok, we will take it into consideration for the planning of the next freeze.
> [...]
>> - How certain are we on the 22nd being the actual release date?
>
> I thought that 10 week cycles were rare, but I checked this and now I'm
> much less confident. Rounding to the nearest week, the distribution of
> release cycle lengths from 3.2 to 4.4 inclusive, is:
>
> 8 weeks: * ( 1)
> 9 weeks: ********** (10)
> 10 weeks: ********** (10)
> 11 weeks: ** ( 2)
>
> (I chose this range to exclude the 3.1 release delayed by the
> kernel.org compromise.)
>
> So it seems quite possible that 4.10 could be released later in January
> or in February.
>
> [...]
Ok, so a reasonable guess would be actually be 10 weeks, which puts us
at the 29th of January? An upstream stable update would come 3-4 weeks
later.
>> * How difficult/disruptive do you expect the migration to linux 4.10
>> will be?
>> - Is this something we can reasonably do within a month? 2 months?
>
> Migration from what, 4.9?
>
Yes - on the assumption that we are going to use 4.10, I presume it
would be easiest to upgrade from 4.9 rather than 4.4 (admittedly, I am
ignoring roll-backs for a moment).
>> [...]
>
>> - How long does Greg's LTS last? We would spend at least a year of
>> it before January 22nd 2017.
>
> About 15 months.
>
> [...]
So Greg's LTS will almost be over by the time 4.10 is released? Seems
like we are not getting a lot from sticking with 4.4 then?
From what I can gather so far:
* We are looking at moving the freeze at least 2 months if we want
Linux 4.10.
- At +2 months, Linux 4.10 would be just before the "deep freeze"
(Assuming a 10 week release cycle for Linux).
* If we stick with 4.4, the Debian Linux maintainers receives
practically no advantage from Greg's LTS effort.
Thanks,
~Niels
Back to linux.debian.devel.release | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-27 19:30 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-01-28 20:10 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-01-28 21:20 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-01-30 15:40 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org> - 2016-02-07 02:00 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch maximilian attems <maks@stro.at> - 2016-01-29 00:10 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-01-30 15:40 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch maximilian attems <maks@stro.at> - 2016-01-30 18:40 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2016-02-02 08:50 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2016-02-02 14:30 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Karsten Merker <merker@debian.org> - 2016-02-03 08:40 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2016-02-03 19:40 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> - 2016-02-04 04:40 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Karsten Merker <merker@debian.org> - 2016-02-03 08:30 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2016-02-04 10:20 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2016-02-04 17:50 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Michael Gilbert <mgilbert@debian.org> - 2016-02-05 01:20 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> - 2016-02-05 10:30 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-02-05 04:10 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2016-02-05 19:50 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-02-14 17:00 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> - 2016-02-14 21:50 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-02-15 13:20 +0100
Re: Kernel version for stretch Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org> - 2016-02-15 09:50 +0100
[Decision] Kernel version for stretch Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2016-02-24 22:50 +0100
Re: [Decision] Kernel version for stretch Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2016-03-02 12:30 +0100
csiph-web