Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1266505
| From | Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [DRBD-user] [PATCH] tree wide: Use kvfree() than conditional kfree()/vfree() |
| Date | 2015-11-10 14:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qthjs-5Fv-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qsTh7-5UJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:56:10PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> There are many locations that do
>
> if (memory_was_allocated_by_vmalloc)
> vfree(ptr);
> else
> kfree(ptr);
>
> but kvfree() can handle both kmalloc()ed memory and vmalloc()ed memory
> using is_vmalloc_addr(). Unless callers have special reasons, we can
> replace this branch with kvfree(). Please check and reply if you found
> problems.
For the DRBD part:
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c | 26 +++++------------
> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h | 3 --
> diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c
> index 9462d27..2daaafb 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c
> @@ -364,12 +364,9 @@ static void bm_free_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long number)
> }
> }
>
> -static void bm_vk_free(void *ptr, int v)
> +static inline void bm_vk_free(void *ptr)
Maybe drop this inline completely ...
> {
> - if (v)
> - vfree(ptr);
> - else
> - kfree(ptr);
> + kvfree(ptr);
> }
... and just call kvfree() directly below?
> - bm_vk_free(new_pages, vmalloced);
> + bm_vk_free(new_pages);
+ kvfree(new_pages);
...
Other than that: looks good and harmless enough.
Thanks,
Lars
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] tree wide: Use kvfree() than conditional kfree()/vfree() Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2015-11-09 13:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tree wide: Use kvfree() than conditional kfree()/vfree() Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2015-11-09 13:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tree wide: Use kvfree() than conditional kfree()/vfree() David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2015-11-09 17:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tree wide: Use kvfree() than conditional kfree()/vfree() Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-09 17:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tree wide: Use kvfree() than conditional kfree()/vfree() "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@intel.com> - 2015-11-09 21:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tree wide: Use kvfree() than conditional kfree()/vfree() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-11-09 22:20 +0100
RE: [PATCH] tree wide: Use kvfree() than conditional kfree()/vfree() "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2015-11-10 00:30 +0100
Re: [DRBD-user] [PATCH] tree wide: Use kvfree() than conditional kfree()/vfree() Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> - 2015-11-10 14:40 +0100
csiph-web