Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #160370
| From | Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: An UML editor for Linux |
| Date | 2015-11-09 21:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qt1om-2Rg-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qsEL7-4SJ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsSEr-5Hy-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsTAt-6h4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsTTQ-6oL-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsUmR-6Ql-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 09.11.2015 16:05, Maximiliano Sebastián Castro wrote: > Sorry to all those i hurt the heart recommending a short term solution > for the original poster. > > I think the pragmatism is very good but for some situations is enemy > of practicality (or how to hell *practicidad* be in english). > > Yes, I've tested (because I've worked in software architecture last > ~10 years and it's my core knowledge and the works I do every day): I > started with Umbrello and Dia years, then I've tested online and new > resourses like, and during there years I discovered that EA, FOR ME, > (***FOR ME, like all people that writes an email writes in their > opinion not as the supreme true in the universe***) is the soft that > acomplished my needs, but it does not mean I not support free tools, > reporting bugs, collaborate and spread in college classes. And not > mean that I integrate the the other free apps. > > I did not know you could get to be a reactive, sarcastic, and > tasteless response. For it was with good intentions, but it seems slow > prefer collaboration instead of a rich debate on what can be better. > The best is relative to each person, and although we are in the > context of this list, I think you as an advocate of the open, you > should be more open. > > In any case if the response is not helpful to the person who posted, > he will tell. > > Maybe he tell us the first response helps him and ignore others > responses, and problem resolved or maybe he try EA and resolve his > problem and then look for similar soft. > > I understand what you say, as you should also try to understand what I > said. > > Thank you and I hope you understand the intent of the message. > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 8:56 AM, <tomas@tuxteam.de > <mailto:tomas@tuxteam.de>> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:13:08AM -0300, Maximiliano Sebastián > Castro wrote: > > >> — could you please recommend me some decent UML editor for Linux? > > > > If you don't care about freedom [...] > > Who cares, anyway? Freedom, schmeedom. > > > Yes, I know it's closed. But the best option for a complete software > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > How would you know that? Have you tested the alternatives? > > Sorry, Maximiliano, for my sarcastic tone. Look -- I'm somewhat > pragmatic, > and don't mind someone recommending a non-free alternative *with a > good > reason* [1] (why is MyFafouriteNonFreeThingie better than > YourNiceFree?). > > We could then all learn from it and perhaps help make a free > alternative > better. > > And here, *we all care* about freedom: perhaps our approaches and > degrees > of commitment are diverse. > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > [1] It's with good intentions, anyway: helping the original poster. > > regards > - -- tomás > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAlZAifgACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYOAgCfbV8ghGD8Y/LtdsShDgnVNskt > MyUAn0ap7hDxy2XLxscxBYWmjQ13uCdE > =sl2t > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Just for the record: I find all responses helpful, especially sarcastic. ) Piyavkin
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 21:30 +0100
Re: An UML editor for Linux Sven Arvidsson <sa@whiz.se> - 2015-11-08 22:00 +0100
Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 19:10 +0100
Re: An UML editor for Linux Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 00:10 +0100
Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 19:10 +0100
Re: An UML editor for Linux deloptes <deloptes@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-09 00:10 +0100
Re: Re: An UML editor for Linux Vader <vader@au.ru> - 2015-11-10 11:20 +0100
Re: An UML editor for Linux David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2015-11-09 00:10 +0100
Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:10 +0100
Re: An UML editor for Linux David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2015-11-09 21:10 +0100
Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:50 +0100
Re: An UML editor for Linux Johann Spies <johann.spies@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 08:50 +0100
Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:50 +0100
Re: An UML editor for Linux Chris Edwards <cedwards.debian@cedwards.geek.nz> - 2015-11-09 12:20 +0100
Re: An UML editor for Linux Maximiliano Sebastián Castro <maxicastrosistemas@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 13:20 +0100
Re: An UML editor for Linux <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2015-11-09 13:40 +0100
Re: An UML editor for Linux Maximiliano Sebastián Castro <maxicastrosistemas@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 14:10 +0100
Re: An UML editor for Linux tomas@tuxteam.de - 2015-11-09 14:40 +0100
Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:40 +0100
Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:30 +0100
Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:30 +0100
Re: An UML editor for Linux ray <ray@aarden.us> - 2015-11-13 15:00 +0100
csiph-web