Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #160370

Re: An UML editor for Linux

From Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: An UML editor for Linux
Date 2015-11-09 21:40 +0100
Message-ID <qt1om-2Rg-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qsEL7-4SJ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsSEr-5Hy-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsTAt-6h4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsTTQ-6oL-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsUmR-6Ql-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 09.11.2015 16:05, Maximiliano Sebastián Castro wrote:
> Sorry to all those i hurt the heart recommending a short term solution 
> for the original poster.
>
> I think the pragmatism is very good but for some situations is enemy 
> of practicality (or how to hell *practicidad* be in english).
>
> Yes, I've tested (because I've worked in software architecture last 
> ~10 years and it's my core knowledge and the works I do every day): I 
> started with Umbrello and Dia years, then I've tested online and new 
> resourses like, and during there years I discovered that EA,  FOR ME, 
> (***FOR ME, like all people that writes an email writes in their 
> opinion not as the supreme true in the universe***) is the soft that 
> acomplished my needs, but it does not mean I not support free tools, 
> reporting bugs, collaborate and spread in college classes. And not 
> mean that I integrate the the other free apps.
>
> I did not know you could get to be a reactive, sarcastic, and 
> tasteless response. For it was with good intentions, but it seems slow 
> prefer collaboration instead of a rich debate on what can be better. 
> The best is relative to each person, and although we are in the 
> context of this list, I think you as an advocate of the open, you 
> should be more open.
>
> In any case if the response is not helpful to the person who posted, 
> he will tell.
>
> Maybe he tell us the first response helps him and ignore others 
> responses, and problem resolved or maybe he try EA and resolve his 
> problem and then look for similar soft.
>
> I understand what you say, as you should also try to understand what I 
> said.
>
> Thank you and I hope you understand the intent of the message.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 8:56 AM, <tomas@tuxteam.de 
> <mailto:tomas@tuxteam.de>> wrote:
>
>     -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>     Hash: SHA1
>
>     On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:13:08AM -0300, Maximiliano Sebastián
>     Castro wrote:
>     > >> — could you please recommend me some decent UML editor for Linux?
>     >
>     > If you don't care about freedom [...]
>
>     Who cares, anyway? Freedom, schmeedom.
>
>     > Yes, I know it's closed. But the best option for a complete software
>                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>     How would you know that? Have you tested the alternatives?
>
>     Sorry, Maximiliano, for my sarcastic tone. Look -- I'm somewhat
>     pragmatic,
>     and don't mind someone recommending a non-free alternative *with a
>     good
>     reason* [1] (why is MyFafouriteNonFreeThingie better than
>     YourNiceFree?).
>
>     We could then all learn from it and perhaps help make a free
>     alternative
>     better.
>
>     And here, *we all care* about freedom: perhaps our approaches and
>     degrees
>     of commitment are diverse.
>
>     - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>     [1] It's with good intentions, anyway: helping the original poster.
>
>     regards
>     - -- tomás
>     -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>     Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
>
>     iEYEARECAAYFAlZAifgACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYOAgCfbV8ghGD8Y/LtdsShDgnVNskt
>     MyUAn0ap7hDxy2XLxscxBYWmjQ13uCdE
>     =sl2t
>     -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>

Just for the record: I find all responses helpful, especially sarcastic. )

Piyavkin

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 21:30 +0100
  Re: An UML editor for Linux Sven Arvidsson <sa@whiz.se> - 2015-11-08 22:00 +0100
    Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 19:10 +0100
  Re: An UML editor for Linux Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 00:10 +0100
    Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 19:10 +0100
  Re: An UML editor for Linux deloptes <deloptes@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-09 00:10 +0100
    Re: Re: An UML editor for Linux Vader <vader@au.ru> - 2015-11-10 11:20 +0100
  Re: An UML editor for Linux David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2015-11-09 00:10 +0100
    Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:10 +0100
      Re: An UML editor for Linux David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2015-11-09 21:10 +0100
        Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:50 +0100
  Re: An UML editor for Linux Johann Spies <johann.spies@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 08:50 +0100
    Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:50 +0100
  Re: An UML editor for Linux Chris Edwards <cedwards.debian@cedwards.geek.nz> - 2015-11-09 12:20 +0100
    Re: An UML editor for Linux Maximiliano Sebastián Castro <maxicastrosistemas@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 13:20 +0100
      Re: An UML editor for Linux <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2015-11-09 13:40 +0100
        Re: An UML editor for Linux Maximiliano Sebastián Castro <maxicastrosistemas@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 14:10 +0100
          Re: An UML editor for Linux tomas@tuxteam.de - 2015-11-09 14:40 +0100
          Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:40 +0100
      Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:30 +0100
    Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:30 +0100
      Re: An UML editor for Linux ray <ray@aarden.us> - 2015-11-13 15:00 +0100

csiph-web