Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #160345

Re: An UML editor for Linux

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Sorry to all those i hurt the heart recommending a short term solution for
the original poster.

I think the pragmatism is very good but for some situations is enemy
of practicality (or how to hell *practicidad* be in english).

Yes, I've tested (because I've worked in software architecture last ~10
years and it's my core knowledge and the works I do every day): I started
with Umbrello and Dia years, then I've tested online and new resourses
like, and during there years I discovered that EA,  FOR ME, (***FOR ME,
like all people that writes an email writes in their opinion not as the
supreme true in the universe***) is the soft that acomplished my needs, but
it does not mean I not support free tools, reporting bugs, collaborate and
spread in college classes. And not mean that I integrate the the other free
apps.

I did not know you could get to be a reactive, sarcastic, and tasteless
response. For it was with good intentions, but it seems slow prefer
collaboration instead of a rich debate on what can be better. The best is
relative to each person, and although we are in the context of this list, I
think you as an advocate of the open, you should be more open.

In any case if the response is not helpful to the person who posted, he
will tell.

Maybe he tell us the first response helps him and ignore others responses,
and problem resolved or maybe he try EA and resolve his problem and then
look for similar soft.

I understand what you say, as you should also try to understand what I said.

Thank you and I hope you understand the intent of the message.


On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 8:56 AM, <tomas@tuxteam.de> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:13:08AM -0300, Maximiliano Sebastián Castro
> wrote:
> > >> — could you please recommend me some decent UML editor for Linux?
> >
> > If you don't care about freedom [...]
>
> Who cares, anyway? Freedom, schmeedom.
>
> > Yes, I know it's closed. But the best option for a complete software
>                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> How would you know that? Have you tested the alternatives?
>
> Sorry, Maximiliano, for my sarcastic tone. Look -- I'm somewhat pragmatic,
> and don't mind someone recommending a non-free alternative *with a good
> reason* [1] (why is MyFafouriteNonFreeThingie better than YourNiceFree?).
>
> We could then all learn from it and perhaps help make a free alternative
> better.
>
> And here, *we all care* about freedom: perhaps our approaches and degrees
> of commitment are diverse.
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
> [1] It's with good intentions, anyway: helping the original poster.
>
> regards
> - -- tomás
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlZAifgACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYOAgCfbV8ghGD8Y/LtdsShDgnVNskt
> MyUAn0ap7hDxy2XLxscxBYWmjQ13uCdE
> =sl2t
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 21:30 +0100
  Re: An UML editor for Linux Sven Arvidsson <sa@whiz.se> - 2015-11-08 22:00 +0100
    Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 19:10 +0100
  Re: An UML editor for Linux Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 00:10 +0100
    Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 19:10 +0100
  Re: An UML editor for Linux deloptes <deloptes@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-09 00:10 +0100
    Re: Re: An UML editor for Linux Vader <vader@au.ru> - 2015-11-10 11:20 +0100
  Re: An UML editor for Linux David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2015-11-09 00:10 +0100
    Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:10 +0100
      Re: An UML editor for Linux David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2015-11-09 21:10 +0100
        Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:50 +0100
  Re: An UML editor for Linux Johann Spies <johann.spies@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 08:50 +0100
    Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:50 +0100
  Re: An UML editor for Linux Chris Edwards <cedwards.debian@cedwards.geek.nz> - 2015-11-09 12:20 +0100
    Re: An UML editor for Linux Maximiliano Sebastián Castro <maxicastrosistemas@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 13:20 +0100
      Re: An UML editor for Linux <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2015-11-09 13:40 +0100
        Re: An UML editor for Linux Maximiliano Sebastián Castro <maxicastrosistemas@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 14:10 +0100
          Re: An UML editor for Linux tomas@tuxteam.de - 2015-11-09 14:40 +0100
          Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:40 +0100
      Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:30 +0100
    Re: An UML editor for Linux Piyavkin <piyavkin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:30 +0100
      Re: An UML editor for Linux ray <ray@aarden.us> - 2015-11-13 15:00 +0100

csiph-web