Re: [PATCH V3 3/5] cpufreq: ondemand: queue work for policy->cpus together

From	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH V3 3/5] cpufreq: ondemand: queue work for policy->cpus together
Date	2015-10-28 09:40 +0100
Message-ID	<qour0-dw-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qj2OK-A2-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qos5P-7j5-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qosIx-7ys-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qot1U-7VJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 28-10-15, 08:33, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> It looks like we shouldn't be using delayed works for this, really.
> 
> We should be using timer functions and normal work items.  Schedule the
> timer function on all CPUs sharing the policy and then queue up the
> work item from the first one that executes the timer.  Then make the
> timer function bail out immediately until the work has completed and
> re-schedule the timers from the work item.

Okay, I will try to get some code out for that then.

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH V3 3/5] cpufreq: ondemand: queue work for policy->cpus together "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-10-28 07:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH V3 3/5] cpufreq: ondemand: queue work for policy->cpus  together Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-10-28 07:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH V3 3/5] cpufreq: ondemand: queue work for policy->cpus together "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-10-28 08:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH V3 3/5] cpufreq: ondemand: queue work for policy->cpus  together Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-10-28 09:40 +0100

csiph-web