Re: [PATCH] x86/entry/32: Fix entry_INT80_32 to expect interrupts to be on

From	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] x86/entry/32: Fix entry_INT80_32 to expect interrupts to be on
Date	2015-10-16 22:20 +0200
Message-ID	<qkjDP-ax-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qkieJ-6nN-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qkjaO-7Ox-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:47:11AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> When I rewrote entry_INT80_32, I thought that int80 was an interrupt
>> gate.  It's a trap gate.  *facepalm*

Ingo, Thomas, don't apply this.  It breaks the 64-bit build for stupid
reasons.  I'll send a v2.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH] x86/entry/32: Fix entry_INT80_32 to expect interrupts to be on Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-10-16 20:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] x86/entry/32: Fix entry_INT80_32 to expect interrupts to  be on Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-10-16 21:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] x86/entry/32: Fix entry_INT80_32 to expect interrupts to  be on Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-10-16 22:20 +0200

csiph-web