Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.php > #13167
| Date | 2014-03-16 21:54 +0100 |
|---|---|
| From | Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.php |
| Subject | Re: Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example |
| References | <1i4cmixzjivy7.fgb9linsyq7u$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| Message-ID | <qkfhva-sj1.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan> (permalink) |
On 16-3-2014 21:22, richard wrote:
> I'll bet you won't.
>
> The table I have now consists of the following columns.
> songid,hits, title, author, license.
> Please explain how this data should be normalised.
> And why.
> Thank you.
>
The column 'author' should be an 'authorId'.
why?
- Because 1 author can write more than 1 song
- An author has properties to, like i.e.:
- birtdate
- date of death (if applicable)
- city of birth
- etc
- etc
Another advantage of this is that, when you found out that you
misspelled the name of this author, you only need to change 1 record to
correct the songs of this author.
Another example of this might be 'license'
If i ask questions like:
When became this license valid?
And 'until when was this a valid license'?
Did the author have more than 1 license?
You might say "this is not applicable to my application"
But, in real life, one should be prepared that this will become
applicable for your application. (Because users only start to think
after they see the portential of your application)
Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example richard <noreply@example.com> - 2014-03-16 16:22 -0400
Re: Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2014-03-16 21:54 +0100
Re: Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example richard <noreply@example.com> - 2014-03-16 19:20 -0400
Re: Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example Scott Johnson <noonehome@chalupasworld.com> - 2014-03-16 17:05 -0700
Re: Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example richard <noreply@example.com> - 2014-03-16 21:43 -0400
Re: Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2014-03-17 04:17 +0000
Re: Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2014-03-16 21:56 +0100
Re: Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2014-03-16 17:29 -0400
Re: Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example Scott Johnson <noonehome@chalupasworld.com> - 2014-03-16 17:12 -0700
Re: Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2014-03-16 21:14 -0400
Re: Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example Scott Johnson <noonehome@chalupasworld.com> - 2014-03-16 19:47 -0700
Re: Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2014-03-16 22:54 -0400
Re: Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-03-25 15:28 +0100
Re: Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example Derek Turner <frderek@cesmail.net> - 2014-03-17 09:37 +0000
Re: Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example Doug Miller <doug_at_milmac_dot_com@example.com> - 2014-03-16 21:34 +0000
Re: Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2014-03-16 18:02 -0400
Re: Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example richard <noreply@example.com> - 2014-03-16 19:09 -0400
Re: Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2014-03-16 21:13 -0400
Re: Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example Geoff Muldoon <geoff.muldoon@trap.gmail.com> - 2014-03-17 10:55 +1100
Re: Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example richard <noreply@example.com> - 2014-03-16 20:13 -0400
Re: Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example Geoff Muldoon <geoff.muldoon@trap.gmail.com> - 2014-03-17 14:54 +1100
Re: Mr. Stuckle and Mr. Miller - explain normalisation with an example Gabe <usenet@moojuice.net> - 2014-03-17 13:56 +0000
csiph-web