Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] ILP32 for ARM64

From	Andrey Konovalov <andrey.konovalov@linaro.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] ILP32 for ARM64
Date	2015-10-01 18:50 +0200
Message-ID	<qePdo-1O6-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qebpD-2HP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qemEv-1ZQ-69@gated-at.bofh.it> <qesJP-2eW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeK42-2oH-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeKno-2Lo-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/01/2015 02:36 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 12:19:31PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 05:41:03PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> Indeed.  On that subject there was some discussion at Linaro Connect
>>> last week about work (being done outside Linaro, not sure how public it
>>> is at this point) to pull together the current state of the art into a
>>> Docker container image which people can use for benchmarking and as a
>>> reference for how to pull things together.  That should help with the
>>> analysis, it'll at least make it easier for other people to reproduce
>>> any benchmarking results.

Using Docker image sounds like a great idea.

>> That's fine and I would welcome it. However, I'm definitely against
>> using non-agreed ABI and further spreading such toolchains (or kernel
>
> You might want to speak to some of your colleagues about that...  in any
> case I'll reply off list later today with information on the third party
> working on this so you can get in touch, like I say I'm not sure how
> public that work is at this point.
>
>> patches; Linaro's tracking kernel has kept these patches for a long
>> time, even though the ABI has been NAK'ed).
>
> I know, I'm not thrilled about that either.  :/

Same for me.
As you have noticed, ILP32 was removed from Linaro's tracking kernel recently.
The thing is that we (builds&baselines team in Linaro) have been requested
to have a CI loop for ILP32. So I'll continue running it, but will use a
separate git branch for ILP32. The linux-linaro branch will not have ILP32
any more (or at least until ILP32 ABI is agreed on).

Thanks,
Andrey

>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Thread

[PATCH v5 00/23] ILP32 for ARM64 Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-09-30 00:20 +0200
  [PATCH v5 08/23] arm64:ilp32: use 64bit syscall-names for ILP32 when passing 64bit registers Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-09-30 00:20 +0200
  [PATCH v5 17/23] arm64:ilp32: add vdso-ilp32 and use for signal return Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-09-30 00:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v5 17/23] arm64:ilp32: add vdso-ilp32 and use for signal  return Nathan Lynch <Nathan_Lynch@mentor.com> - 2015-09-30 06:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v5 17/23] arm64:ilp32: add vdso-ilp32 and use for signal  return Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-10-01 21:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v5 17/23] arm64:ilp32: add vdso-ilp32 and use for signal return "Dr. Philipp Tomsich" <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com> - 2015-10-01 22:40 +0200
  [PATCH v5 09/23] arm64:ilp32: use non-compat syscall names for ILP32 as for LP64 Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-09-30 00:20 +0200
  [PATCH v5 23/23] arm64:ilp32: add ARM64_ILP32 to Kconfig Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-09-30 00:20 +0200
  [PATCH v5 13/23] arm64:ilp32: share HWCAP between LP64 and ILP32 Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-09-30 00:20 +0200
  [PATCH v5 04/23] arm64: change some CONFIG_COMPAT over to use CONFIG_AARCH32_EL0 instead Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-09-30 00:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v5 04/23] arm64: change some CONFIG_COMPAT over to use  CONFIG_AARCH32_EL0 instead kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2015-09-30 05:40 +0200
  [PATCH v5 02/23] arm64: ensure the kernel is compiled for LP64 Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-09-30 00:20 +0200
  [PATCH v5 16/23] arm64: add support for starting ILP32 (ELFCLASS32) binaries Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-09-30 00:20 +0200
  [PATCH v5 15/23] arm64:ilp32: support core dump generation for ILP32 Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-09-30 00:20 +0200
  [PATCH v5 05/23] arm64:ilp32: expose 'kernel_long' as 'long long' for ILP32 Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-09-30 00:20 +0200
  [PATCH v5 10/23] arm64: introduce is_a32_task and is_a32_thread (for AArch32 compat) Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-09-30 00:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v5 10/23] arm64: introduce is_a32_task and is_a32_thread  (for AArch32 compat) kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2015-09-30 05:50 +0200
  [PATCH v5 22/23] aarch64: ilp32: msgrcv, msgsnd handlers Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-09-30 00:30 +0200
  [PATCH v5 20/23] arm64:ilp32: use the native siginfo instead of the compat siginfo Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-09-30 00:30 +0200
  [PATCH v5 07/23] arm64:ilp32: share signal structures between ILP32 and LP64 ABIs Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-09-30 00:30 +0200
  [PATCH v5 19/23] arm64:ilp32: add sys_ilp32.c and a separate table (in entry.S) to use it Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-09-30 00:30 +0200
  [PATCH v5 21/23] arm64:ilp32: change COMPAT_ELF_PLATFORM to report a a subplatform for ILP32 Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-09-30 00:30 +0200
  [PATCH v5 18/23] ptrace: Allow compat to use the native siginfo Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-09-30 00:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] ILP32 for ARM64 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2015-09-30 12:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] ILP32 for ARM64 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-09-30 18:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] ILP32 for ARM64 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2015-10-01 13:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] ILP32 for ARM64 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-10-01 13:40 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] ILP32 for ARM64 Andrey Konovalov <andrey.konovalov@linaro.org> - 2015-10-01 18:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] ILP32 for ARM64 Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-10-01 21:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] ILP32 for ARM64 Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-10-01 21:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] ILP32 for ARM64 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-01 23:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] ILP32 for ARM64 "Pinski, Andrew" <Andrew.Pinski@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-10-01 23:50 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] ILP32 for ARM64 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2015-10-02 11:40 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] ILP32 for ARM64 "Kapoor, Prasun" <Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-10-03 05:00 +0200
              Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] ILP32 for ARM64 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2015-10-05 18:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] ILP32 for ARM64 "Pinski, Andrew" <Andrew.Pinski@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-10-05 23:10 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] ILP32 for ARM64 Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> - 2015-10-05 21:20 +0200

csiph-web