Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1230310

Re: Please suggest proper format for DT properties.

From Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: Please suggest proper format for DT properties.
Date 2015-09-22 17:20 +0200
Message-ID <qbxwm-DB-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qactX-7Xb-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qbrhf-8vS-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qbxmG-sc-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tuesday 22 September 2015 08:08:25 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > I would strongly prefer Option 1 or 2 over option 3.
> > Between 1 and 2, I'd probably go for 1. Another option might
> > be to have a subnode per sensor:
> >
> > nct7802@2a {
> >          compatible = "nuvoton,nct7802";
> >          reg = <0x2a>;
> >       #address-cells=<1>;
> >       #size-cells=<0>;
> >
> >       sensor@1 {
> >               compatible = "nuvoton,nct7802-thermistor";
> >               further-properties;
> >       };
> >       sensor@3 {
> >               compatible = "nuvoton,nct7802-voltage";
> >               for-example-range-mv = <0 5000>;
> >       };
> > };
> >
> I personally would prefer this approach. It would also make it easier to add more
> properties. Wonder what is more appropriate, though - a compatible property or
> something like the following ?
>                 sensor-type = "xxx";
> 
> I don't have a preference, just asking.

I'm not sure here, either way would work, and we are not particularly
consistent in this regard. Maybe someone else has a stronger preference.

> Also, would the index be derived from "@1", or should there be a reg property ?

There needs to be a 'reg' property. Sorry for missing that above.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Please suggest proper format for DT properties. Constantine Shulyupin <const@MakeLinux.com> - 2015-09-19 00:40 +0200
  Re: Please suggest proper format for DT properties. Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2015-09-21 04:00 +0200
    Re: Please suggest proper format for DT properties. Constantine Shulyupin <const@makelinux.com> - 2015-09-21 21:30 +0200
      Re: Please suggest proper format for DT properties. Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2015-09-22 02:40 +0200
  Re: Please suggest proper format for DT properties. Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-09-22 10:40 +0200
    Re: Please suggest proper format for DT properties. Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-09-22 17:10 +0200
      Re: Please suggest proper format for DT properties. Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-09-22 17:20 +0200

csiph-web