Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1328777
| From | GregKH <greg@kroah.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] w1: w1_process() is not freezable kthread |
| Date | 2016-02-08 06:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qZMIi-Ft-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qnIZ4-4nx-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qodzQ-6jT-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <qort9-6PV-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrt5o-7ln-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <qwzDc-2M9-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 04:49:41PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > > > I fail to see why this kthread should be freezable at all. There is no way > > > for w1 device to generate new I/O requests that should be written out to > > > filesystem, is it? > > > > w1 doesn't generate such requests, but it was more to make this thread > > consistent with majority of other threads in the kernel. > > Most of which actually don't need freezer at all, and only contribute to > the overall confusion regarding what kthread freezer is actually for. > > It's my long-term goal to fix this situation (and this patch is part of > some preparatory steps :) ). > > > Ok, I'm not against it, Greg please pull this patch into your tree. > > > > Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net> > > Greg, do you plan to take this please? I don't seem to see it in > linux-next as of today. I can't find this patch anywhere in my queue, can you please resend it to me with the ack so I can apply it? thanks, greg k-h
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] w1: w1_process() is not freezable kthread GregKH <greg@kroah.com> - 2016-02-08 06:40 +0100
csiph-web