Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1328777 > unrolled thread
| Started by | GregKH <greg@kroah.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-08 06:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-08 06:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] w1: w1_process() is not freezable kthread GregKH <greg@kroah.com> - 2016-02-08 06:40 +0100
| From | GregKH <greg@kroah.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-08 06:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] w1: w1_process() is not freezable kthread |
| Message-ID | <qZMIi-Ft-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 04:49:41PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > > > I fail to see why this kthread should be freezable at all. There is no way > > > for w1 device to generate new I/O requests that should be written out to > > > filesystem, is it? > > > > w1 doesn't generate such requests, but it was more to make this thread > > consistent with majority of other threads in the kernel. > > Most of which actually don't need freezer at all, and only contribute to > the overall confusion regarding what kthread freezer is actually for. > > It's my long-term goal to fix this situation (and this patch is part of > some preparatory steps :) ). > > > Ok, I'm not against it, Greg please pull this patch into your tree. > > > > Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net> > > Greg, do you plan to take this please? I don't seem to see it in > linux-next as of today. I can't find this patch anywhere in my queue, can you please resend it to me with the ack so I can apply it? thanks, greg k-h
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web