Re: Isn't 4.4 long term stable?

From	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: Isn't 4.4 long term stable?
Date	2016-02-02 18:20 +0100
Message-ID	<qXMMs-6gE-35@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qXMjn-5NR-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:09:38PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote:
> Hey guys,
> 
> kernel.org lists linux 4.4.1 as "stable" but the releases page lists
> it as a long term stable kernel. Which one is true?

Both :)

It hasn't had the "chance" to be a longterm stable kernel given that
there hasn't been anything to replace it yet :)

But you are right, I'll go submit a patch to the releases page to mark
it as a longterm kernel so that people don't get confused.

thanks,

greg k-h

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Isn't 4.4 long term stable? Ani Sinha <ani@arista.com> - 2016-02-02 17:50 +0100
  Re: Isn't 4.4 long term stable? Holger Hoffstätte   <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com> - 2016-02-02 18:10 +0100
  Re: Isn't 4.4 long term stable? Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-02-02 18:20 +0100

csiph-web