Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1324290
| From | Holger Hoffstätte <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Isn't 4.4 long term stable? |
| Date | 2016-02-02 18:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qXMCL-6cq-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qXMjn-5NR-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 22:09:38 +0530, Ani Sinha wrote: > kernel.org lists linux 4.4.1 as "stable" but the releases page lists > it as a long term stable kernel. Which one is true? Both :) 4.4.1 is the *current* stable release and will be labeled LTS when 4.5.1 is released. It has been this way for quite some time now. -h
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Isn't 4.4 long term stable? Ani Sinha <ani@arista.com> - 2016-02-02 17:50 +0100 Re: Isn't 4.4 long term stable? Holger Hoffstätte <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com> - 2016-02-02 18:10 +0100 Re: Isn't 4.4 long term stable? Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-02-02 18:20 +0100
csiph-web