Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1321134
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] regulator: mt6323: Add support for MT6323 regulator |
| Date | 2016-01-29 00:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qW414-2cO-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qVx59-3fC-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVx59-3fC-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVzzY-4VL-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVZkK-7kv-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 07:13:48PM +0100, John Crispin wrote: > would the following two bindings be ok ? I would create patches to add them. > * regulator-allow-mode; or regulator-allow-change-mode; This seems redundant, if we have a list of valid modes presumably they can be used - same idea as with voltage setting. > * regulator-modes = <REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY>; I'm not convinced this binding makes sense, how would a user of the API (currently there are none in tree) know what the modes mean? It's a bit different when the user is supplying configuration for a specific regulator but this needs to be something that can be used by consumers. What are you actually trying to do with this?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] regulator: mt6323: Add support for MT6323 regulator John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> - 2016-01-28 19:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] regulator: mt6323: Add support for MT6323 regulator Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-01-29 00:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] regulator: mt6323: Add support for MT6323 regulator menghui lin <menghui.lin@mediatek.com> - 2016-01-29 11:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] regulator: mt6323: Add support for MT6323 regulator Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-01-29 12:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] regulator: mt6323: Add support for MT6323 regulator menghui lin <menghui.lin@mediatek.com> - 2016-01-29 13:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] regulator: mt6323: Add support for MT6323 regulator Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-02-02 20:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] regulator: mt6323: Add support for MT6323 regulator Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-02-02 20:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] regulator: mt6323: Add support for MT6323 regulator menghui lin <menghui.lin@mediatek.com> - 2016-02-03 06:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] regulator: mt6323: Add support for MT6323 regulator Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-02-03 13:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] regulator: mt6323: Add support for MT6323 regulator menghui lin <menghui.lin@mediatek.com> - 2016-02-04 03:50 +0100
csiph-web