Groups > linux.kernel > #1320115

Re: [PATCH] power: APM_EMULATION does not depend on PM

From	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] power: APM_EMULATION does not depend on PM
Date	2016-01-28 00:00 +0100
Message-ID	<qVHec-2ip-53@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qURyX-64A-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Monday, January 25, 2016 04:48:28 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The APM emulation code does multiple things, and some of them depend on
> PM_SLEEP, while the battery management does not. However, selecting
> the symbol like SHARPSL_PM does causes a Kconfig warning:
> 
> warning: (SHARPSL_PM && PMAC_APM_EMU) selects APM_EMULATION which has unmet direct dependencies (PM && SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION)
> 
> From all I can tell, this is completely harmless, and we can simply allow
> APM_EMULATION to be enabled here, even if PM is not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Applied, thanks!

Rafael

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH] power: APM_EMULATION does not depend on PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-01-25 16:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] power: APM_EMULATION does not depend on PM "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-01-28 00:00 +0100

csiph-web