Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1312011
| From | chenfeng <puck.chen@hisilicon.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH RESEND] android: binder: Sanity check at binder ioctl |
| Date | 2016-01-19 10:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qSAiR-5me-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qSvCy-23U-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSz3r-4CI-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSzmO-4JC-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSzZw-5fh-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2016/1/19 16:35, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:49:27PM +0800, chenfeng wrote: >> >> >> On 2016/1/19 15:33, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:45:36AM +0800, Chen Feng wrote: >>>> When a process fork a child process, we should not allow the >>>> child process use the binder which opened by parent process. >>>> >>>> But if the binder-object creater is a thread of one process who exit, >>>> the other thread can also use this binder-object normally. >>>> We can distinguish this by the member proc->tsk->mm. >>>> If the thread exit the tsk->mm will be NULL. >>>> >>>> proc->tsk->mm != current->mm && proc->tsk->mm >>>> >>>> So only allow the shared mm_struct to use the same binder-object and >>>> check the existence of mm_struct. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Feng <puck.chen@hisilicon.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Dong <weidong2@hisilicon.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Junmin Zhao <zhaojunmin@huawei.com> >>>> Reviewed-by: Zhuangluan Su <suzhuangluan@hisilicon.com> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/android/binder.c | 2 ++ >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>> >>> Why resend? What changed from the previous version? >>> >> My fault, it's my error commit. >> mistake the current->mm with current->tsk->mm. >> The robot-compile finds out this error. > > Then please make it a 'v2' patch, and say what you changed, otherwise > I'll assume it's identical to the first patch you sent in. > > And how did you test the first patch if it couldn't even compile? > It works well on our platform with hundreds of mobile phone. Since our working branch is not mainline,and the patch is send for mainline review. I made a mistake while making the patch. I will send a new V2 for this patch. Thanks! > greg k-h > > . >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH RESEND] android: binder: Sanity check at binder ioctl Chen Feng <puck.chen@hisilicon.com> - 2016-01-19 05:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] android: binder: Sanity check at binder ioctl Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-01-19 08:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] android: binder: Sanity check at binder ioctl chenfeng <puck.chen@hisilicon.com> - 2016-01-19 09:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] android: binder: Sanity check at binder ioctl Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-01-19 09:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] android: binder: Sanity check at binder ioctl chenfeng <puck.chen@hisilicon.com> - 2016-01-19 10:00 +0100
csiph-web