Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

From	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option
Date	2015-12-08 01:40 +0100
Message-ID	<qDetY-3wh-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qzkoh-7vo-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 00:03:55 +0900 Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Xeon E7 v3 based systems supports Address Range Mirroring
> and UEFI BIOS complied with UEFI spec 2.5 can notify which
> ranges are reliable (mirrored) via EFI memory map.
> Now Linux kernel utilize its information and allocates
> boot time memory from reliable region.
> 
> My requirement is:
>   - allocate kernel memory from reliable region
>   - allocate user memory from non-reliable region
> 
> In order to meet my requirement, ZONE_MOVABLE is useful.
> By arranging non-reliable range into ZONE_MOVABLE,
> reliable memory is only used for kernel allocations.
> 
> My idea is to extend existing "kernelcore" option and
> introduces kernelcore=reliable option. By specifying
> "reliable" instead of specifying the amount of memory,
> non-reliable region will be arranged into ZONE_MOVABLE.

It is unfortunate that the kernel presently refers to this memory as
"mirrored", but this patchset introduces the new term "reliable".  I
think it would be better if we use "mirrored" throughout.

Of course, mirroring isn't the only way to get reliable memory. 
Perhaps if a part of the system memory has ECC correction then this
also can be accessed using "reliable", in which case your proposed
naming makes sense.  reliable == mirrored || ecc?

Secondly, does this patchset mean that kernelcore=reliable and
kernelcore=100M are exclusive?  Or can the user specify
"kernelcore=reliable,kernelcore=100M" to use 100M of reliable memory
for kernelcore?

This is unclear from the documentation and I suggest that this be
spelled out.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-12-08 01:40 +0100
  RE: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option "Izumi, Taku" <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com> - 2015-12-08 09:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 17:20 +0100
      RE: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option "Izumi, Taku" <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com> - 2015-12-09 01:00 +0100

csiph-web