Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1286647

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Izumi, Taku <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>  Which do you think is beter ?
>    - change into kernelcore="mirrored"
>    - keep kernelcore="reliable" and minmal printk fix

UEFI came up with the "reliable" wording (as a more generic term ...
as Andrew said
it could cover differences in ECC modes, or some alternate memory
technology that
has lower error rates).

But I personally like "mirror" more ... it matches current
implementation. Of course
I'll look silly if some future system does something other than mirror.

-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-12-08 01:40 +0100
  RE: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option "Izumi, Taku" <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com> - 2015-12-08 09:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 17:20 +0100
      RE: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option "Izumi, Taku" <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com> - 2015-12-09 01:00 +0100

csiph-web